From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:37:36 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dongdong Liu , Charles Chenxin , linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI/portdrv: Remove excessive comments Message-ID: <20171020133736.GA29368@lst.de> References: <20171019225726.17806.62380.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20171019230115.17806.52138.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> <20171020070731.GD11101@lst.de> <20171020133143.GG6332@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20171020133143.GG6332@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> List-ID: On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:31:43AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:07:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 06:01:15PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > > > Remove some wordy and repetitive comments so we can see the code better. > > > The register field #defines should be enough of a hook to find relevant > > > descriptions in the spec. No functional change. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > Of course my comments were actually useful ;-) > > Oops, I thought I was mainly removing stuff I had added myself :) > I added back this single comment in place of the three essentially > similar ones: I don't think we need these - it's pretty clear that you need to spec for those. It was just intended as a snarky comment that you basically kept mine, just rewritten to be a little more clear. Sorry for the confusion.