From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bastet.se.axis.com ([195.60.68.11]:58221 "EHLO bastet.se.axis.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752972AbeBEQZW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 11:25:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:25:20 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Jingoo Han Cc: 'Andy Shevchenko' , 'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' , 'Joao Pinto' , 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' , 'Bjorn Helgaas' , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, 'Linux Kernel Mailing List' Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: designware-ep: Return an error when requesting a too large BAR size Message-ID: <20180205162519.GA3044@axis.com> References: <20180201161119.3852-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <20180201161119.3852-4-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <000601d39b8e$f58a76f0$e09f64d0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <000601d39b8e$f58a76f0$e09f64d0$@gmail.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 02:00:40PM -0500, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, February 1, 2018 1:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Niklas Cassel > > wrote: > > > > include/linux/sizes.h: > > > > +SZ_4G 0x100000000ULL > > > > > + if (size > 0x100000000ULL) { > > > > #include > > > > if (size > SZ_4G) { > > I like this one for the readability. > Thank you. > I liked it too, however both variants if (size > 0x100000000ULL) { if (size > SZ_4G) { result in: drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c:131:11: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits] when compiling with W=1 on a platform with 32-bit size_t. The annoying thing here is that a BAR can be 64-bit, yet the parameter size is defined as a size_t, so the error will only show on 32-bit and not on 64-bit. What do you think about: if (upper_32_bits(size)) { dev_err(pci->dev, "can't handle BAR larger than 4GB\n"); return -EINVAL; } That should compile without warnings for both 32-bit size_t and 64-bit size_t. Regards, Niklas