From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.daly@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mheyne@amazon.de,
liang-min.wang@intel.com, mark.d.rustad@intel.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk
Subject: [pci PATCH v3 3/3] virtio_pci: Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV on virtio_pci devices
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 11:30:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306192957.3153.60365.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180306192423.3153.42741.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Hardware-realized virtio_pci devices can implement SR-IOV, so this
patch enables its use. The device in question is an upcoming Intel
NIC that implements both a virtio_net PF and virtio_net VFs. These
are hardware realizations of what has been up to now been a software
interface.
The device in question has the following 4-part PCI IDs:
PF: vendor: 1af4 device: 1041 subvendor: 8086 subdevice: 15fe
VF: vendor: 1af4 device: 1041 subvendor: 8086 subdevice: 05fe
The patch currently needs no check for device ID, because the callback
will never be made for devices that do not assert the capability or
when run on a platform incapable of SR-IOV.
One reason for this patch is because the hardware requires the
vendor ID of a VF to be the same as the vendor ID of the PF that
created it. So it seemed logical to simply have a fully-functioning
virtio_net PF create the VFs. This patch makes that possible.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
index 48d4d1cf1cb6..ca1549393255 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
else
virtio_pci_modern_remove(vp_dev);
+ pci_disable_sriov(pci_dev);
pci_disable_device(pci_dev);
put_device(dev);
}
@@ -596,6 +597,9 @@ static void virtio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
.driver.pm = &virtio_pci_pm_ops,
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
+ .sriov_configure = pci_sriov_configure_unmanaged,
+#endif
};
module_pci_driver(virtio_pci_driver);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 19:29 [pci PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV Alexander Duyck
2018-03-06 19:29 ` [pci PATCH v3 1/3] pci-iov: " Alexander Duyck
2018-03-06 19:29 ` [pci PATCH v3 2/3] vfio: Add support for unmanaged or userspace managed SR-IOV Alexander Duyck
2018-03-06 19:30 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2018-03-07 6:46 ` [pci PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-07 19:05 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180306192957.3153.60365.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.daly@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liang-min.wang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
--cc=mheyne@amazon.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).