From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Mario.Limonciello@dell.com,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v4 8/9] PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:52:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180403145225.22371-9-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403145225.22371-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is a sanity checker in the end of pci_scan_child_bus_extend() that
tries to detect badly configured bridges. For example given the below
topology:
+-1b.0-[01-39]----00.0-[02-3a]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0
+-01.0-[04-39]--
\-02.0-[3a]----00.0
The sanity checker notices this and logs following messages:
pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:02 [bus 02-39]
pci_bus 0000:3a: [bus 3a] partially hidden behind bridge 0000:01 [bus 01-39]
This is not really helpful to users and the information above is not
even correct (0000:02 is a bus not bridge). Make this a bit more
understandable by changing the sanity checker to log following message
in place of the above two messages:
pci 0000:02:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign [bus 3a] for them
While there update the comment on top of the sanity checker block to
make it clear that it is not only restricted to CardBus.
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 14 +++++---------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 079eea6680bb..70b07a0e00b8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1175,20 +1175,16 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
(is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus %04x:%02x" : "PCI Bus %04x:%02x"),
pci_domain_nr(bus), child->number);
- /* Has only triggered on CardBus, fixup is in yenta_socket */
+ /* Check that all devices are accessible */
while (bus->parent) {
if ((child->busn_res.end > bus->busn_res.end) ||
(child->number > bus->busn_res.end) ||
(child->number < bus->number) ||
(child->busn_res.end < bus->number)) {
- dev_info(&child->dev, "%pR %s hidden behind%s bridge %s %pR\n",
- &child->busn_res,
- (bus->number > child->busn_res.end &&
- bus->busn_res.end < child->number) ?
- "wholly" : "partially",
- bus->self->transparent ? " transparent" : "",
- dev_name(&bus->dev),
- &bus->busn_res);
+ dev_info(&dev->dev,
+ "devices behind bridge are unusable because we cannot assign %pR for them\n",
+ &child->busn_res);
+ break;
}
bus = bus->parent;
}
--
2.16.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-03 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 14:52 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/9] PCI: Fixes and cleanups for native PCIe and ACPI hotplug Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/9] PCI: Take all bridges into account when calculating bus numbers for extension Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/9] PCI: Take bridge window alignment into account when distributing resources Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/9] PCI: pciehp: Clear Presence Detect and Data Link Layer Status Changed on resume Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Do not scan all bridges when native PCIe hotplug is used Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 5/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Mark stale PCI devices disconnected Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 6/9] PCI: Move resource distribution for a single bridge outside of the loop Mika Westerberg
2018-04-10 15:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 7/9] PCI: Document return value of pci_scan_bridge() and pci_scan_bridge_extend() Mika Westerberg
2018-04-10 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-03 14:52 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2018-04-10 15:04 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 8/9] PCI: Improve "partially hidden behind bridge" log message Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-11 9:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2018-04-03 14:52 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 9/9] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Drop unnecessary parentheses Mika Westerberg
2018-04-10 15:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180403145225.22371-9-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=yehezkel.bernat@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).