From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mroos@linux.ee
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc64 PCI BAR allocation is still problematic
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:21:52 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180408.172152.113123578529151252.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1804081219340.17185@math.ut.ee>
From: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 21:44:57 +0300 (EEST)
> This is a followup on the thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/7/135 and
> corresponding https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117191 entry.
>
> I saw some sparc64 PCI allocation changes in yesterdays git and compiled
> 4.16.0-10242-gf605ba9 on most of my sparc64 machines to test if the PCI
> BAR allocation problems introduced in 4.3 were fixed on some of them.
> Alas, no change at all - of the test machines, none showed any changes
> in the error messages in "dmesg | grep BAR".
>
> There was one test machine, T1000 with no addon cards, that did not
> encounter any problem, before or after the recent patch. All the other
> test machines tried still have the BAR allocation problems.
>
> The errors seem to cluster into 3 categories:
>
> 1. many devices fail BAR allocations
> 2. one of the Davicom Ethernet devices fails BAR allocation
> 3. Uli ISA bridge fails BAR allocation.
>
> Full current dmesg and lspci info is also available if there is any
> interest. I did not include it all here, which machines are interesting?
PCI folks, please look into this.
A regression like this should not linger since 4.3, thank you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-08 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-08 18:44 sparc64 PCI BAR allocation is still problematic Meelis Roos
2018-04-08 21:21 ` David Miller [this message]
2018-04-09 3:00 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-09 10:47 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-09 3:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-09 14:30 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-10 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-10 18:45 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-10 18:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-11 7:59 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-11 13:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-11 14:40 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-11 20:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-11 20:25 ` Meelis Roos
2018-04-11 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-21 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-20 22:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-29 10:06 ` Meelis Roos
2018-06-29 13:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-07-06 19:49 ` Meelis Roos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180408.172152.113123578529151252.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).