linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Aron Griffis <aron@arongriffis.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCIe unsupported request with Intel 760p
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 09:12:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507151246.GB20686@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507134354.GF18116@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:43:54AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 08:30:35AM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > I'm getting this error continuously with an Intel 760p on 4.16.5 (Fedora 28)
> > 
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: id=00e8
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, id=00e8(Requester ID)
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:a298] error status/mask=00100000/00010000
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] Unsupported Request    (First)
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   TLP Header: 34000000 70000010 00000000 88468846
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: broadcast error_detected message
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: broadcast mmio_enabled message
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: broadcast resume message
> > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Device recovery successful
> > 
> > Willy graciously decoded this for me to a "Latency Tolerance Reporting
> > Message," and suggested I send email to this list to check whether it's a
> > problem with the device or driver.
> 
> Decoding this further, the Requester ID is 70:00.0 (ie the NVMe device is
> sending the LTR message) so the Root Port is the one saying "Unsupported
> Request".  Which is fair enough, because ...
> 
> > 00:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 200 Series PCH PCI Express Root Port #9 (rev f0) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> > 	Bus: primary=00, secondary=70, subordinate=70, sec-latency=0
> > 		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABC, TimeoutDis+, LTR-, OBFF Not Supported ARIFwd+
> > 			 AtomicOpsCap: Routing- 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
> > 		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR-, OBFF Disabled ARIFwd-
> > 			 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn- EgressBlck-
> 
> the Root Port doesn't know what LTR is.
> 
> > 70:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Intel Corporation Device f1a6 (rev 03) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
> > 	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
> > 		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR+, OBFF Not Supported
> > 			 AtomicOpsCap: 32bit- 64bit- 128bitCAS-
> > 		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR-, OBFF Disabled
> > 			 AtomicOpsCtl: ReqEn-
> 
> The device *does* know what LTR is, but it's supposed to be disabled.
> 
> Is there more recent firmware for this device?

Hi Willy,

Thank you for the detailed analysis. :)

I'm not familiar with this device, but I'll check internally to see if
this a later firmware release address this.

Aron,
Could you let me know the firmware revision you're currently running?

Thanks,
Keith

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-07 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAKDfzeD5_AV=YtWqTPr=40vvW4oMFAs4gJs_r42PJWcb815zyQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-05-07 12:30 ` PCIe unsupported request with Intel 760p Aron Griffis
2018-05-07 13:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-07 15:12     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-07 15:16       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-05-07 15:57       ` Aron Griffis
2018-05-07 16:08         ` Keith Busch
2018-05-11 19:39       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-11 20:02         ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 23:20   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:33     ` Bryan Gurney
2018-07-02 16:36     ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180507151246.GB20686@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aron@arongriffis.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).