From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34476 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754101AbeFUH2U (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:28:20 -0400
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:28:19 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
        Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] PCI/DPC: Defer event handling to work queue
Message-ID: <20180621072819.GB18738@infradead.org>
References: <20180620213833.25072-1-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <20180620213833.25072-2-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <20180621072727.GA18738@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20180621072727.GA18738@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > This moves all event handling to the existing work queue, which will
> > make passing event information simpler to the handler.
> 
> I wonder if just using a threaded interrupt would be useful for
> the DPC handler?

Ok, I should have read until the end of the thread first..