[PATCH 0/3] PCI: mvebu: cleanup and improvements

[PATCH 0/3] PCI: mvebu: cleanup and improvements

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello,

The main goal of this series is to convert the pci-mvebu driver to use
the pci_host_bridge API directly instead of using the ARM-specific
pci_common_init_dev() API. After this series, the last remaining user
of pci_common_init_dev() is pci-rcar-gen2.

I would appreciate some careful review of the MEM and IO resource
related changes (i.e the new mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources()
function), since the mvebu driver is a bit special in that respect,
and cannot use the standard devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()
API.

Thanks,

Thomas

Thomas Petazzoni (3):
  PCI: mvebu: Remove redundant platform_set_drvdata() call
  PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge directly
  PCI: mvebu: Drop bogus comment above mvebu_pcie_map_registers()

 drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

-- 
2.14.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/3] PCI: mvebu: Remove redundant platform_set_drvdata() call

[Thomas Petazzoni]

This is already done earlier in mvebu_pcie_probe().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
index 358b56ba7c37..0e729bab14c0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -1115,8 +1115,6 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	mvebu_pcie_enable(pcie);
 
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.14.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/3] PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge directly

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Rather than using the ARM-specific pci_common_init_dev() API, use the
pci_host_bridge logic directly.

Unfortunately, we can't use devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(),
because the DT binding for describing PCIe apertures for this PCI
controller is a bit special, and we cannot retrieve them from the
'ranges' property. Therefore, we still have some special code to
handle this.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
index 0e729bab14c0..6e801cef2c5f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct mvebu_pcie {
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	struct mvebu_pcie_port *ports;
 	struct msi_controller *msi;
+	struct list_head resources;
 	struct resource io;
 	struct resource realio;
 	struct resource mem;
@@ -632,7 +633,7 @@ static struct mvebu_pcie_port *mvebu_pcie_find_port(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie,
 static int mvebu_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
 			      int where, int size, u32 val)
 {
-	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
+	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
 	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -658,7 +659,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
 static int mvebu_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
 			      int size, u32 *val)
 {
-	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
+	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
 	struct mvebu_pcie_port *port;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -689,36 +690,6 @@ static struct pci_ops mvebu_pcie_ops = {
 	.write = mvebu_pcie_wr_conf,
 };
 
-static int mvebu_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
-{
-	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys);
-	int err, i;
-
-	pcie->mem.name = "PCI MEM";
-	pcie->realio.name = "PCI I/O";
-
-	if (resource_size(&pcie->realio) != 0)
-		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->realio,
-					sys->io_offset);
-
-	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem, sys->mem_offset);
-	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pcie->busn);
-
-	err = devm_request_pci_bus_resources(&pcie->pdev->dev, &sys->resources);
-	if (err)
-		return 0;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pcie->nports; i++) {
-		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
-
-		if (!port->base)
-			continue;
-		mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(port);
-	}
-
-	return 1;
-}
-
 static resource_size_t mvebu_pcie_align_resource(struct pci_dev *dev,
 						 const struct resource *res,
 						 resource_size_t start,
@@ -749,26 +720,6 @@ static resource_size_t mvebu_pcie_align_resource(struct pci_dev *dev,
 		return start;
 }
 
-static void mvebu_pcie_enable(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
-{
-	struct hw_pci hw;
-
-	memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw));
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-	hw.msi_ctrl = pcie->msi;
-#endif
-
-	hw.nr_controllers = 1;
-	hw.private_data   = (void **)&pcie;
-	hw.setup          = mvebu_pcie_setup;
-	hw.map_irq        = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
-	hw.ops            = &mvebu_pcie_ops;
-	hw.align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
-
-	pci_common_init_dev(&pcie->pdev->dev, &hw);
-}
-
 /*
  * Looks up the list of register addresses encoded into the reg =
  * <...> property for one that matches the given port/lane. Once
@@ -1022,28 +973,38 @@ static void mvebu_pcie_powerdown(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 	clk_disable_unprepare(port->clk);
 }
 
-static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+/*
+ * We can't use devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() because we
+ * need to parse our special DT properties encoding the MEM and IO
+ * apertures.
+ */
+static int mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(struct mvebu_pcie *pcie)
 {
-	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
+	struct device *dev = &pcie->pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-	struct device_node *child;
-	int num, i, ret;
+	int ret;
 
-	pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pcie)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcie->resources);
 
-	pcie->pdev = pdev;
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
+	/* Get the bus range */
+	ret = of_pci_parse_bus_range(np, &pcie->busn);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse bus-range property: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	pci_add_resource(&pcie->resources, &pcie->busn);
 
-	/* Get the PCIe memory and I/O aperture */
+	/* Get the PCIe memory aperture */
 	mvebu_mbus_get_pcie_mem_aperture(&pcie->mem);
 	if (resource_size(&pcie->mem) == 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "invalid memory aperture size\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	pcie->mem.name = "PCI MEM";
+	pci_add_resource_offset(&pcie->resources, &pcie->mem, 0);
+
+	/* Get the PCIe IO aperture */
 	mvebu_mbus_get_pcie_io_aperture(&pcie->io);
 
 	if (resource_size(&pcie->io) != 0) {
@@ -1055,12 +1016,42 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	} else
 		pcie->realio = pcie->io;
 
-	/* Get the bus range */
-	ret = of_pci_parse_bus_range(np, &pcie->busn);
-	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse bus-range property: %d\n", ret);
+	pcie->realio.name = "PCI I/O";
+
+	if (resource_size(&pcie->realio) != 0)
+		pci_add_resource_offset(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio, 0);
+
+	ret = devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
+	if (ret)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = pci_remap_iospace(&pcie->realio, pcie->realio.start);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
+	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct device_node *child;
+	int num, i, ret;
+
+	bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(struct mvebu_pcie));
+	if (!bridge)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
+	pcie->pdev = pdev;
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
+
+	ret = mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(pcie);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	}
 
 	num = of_get_available_child_count(np);
 
@@ -1104,18 +1095,24 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			continue;
 		}
 
+		mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(port);
 		mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr(port, 1);
 		mvebu_pci_sw_bridge_init(port);
 	}
 
 	pcie->nports = i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < (IO_SPACE_LIMIT - SZ_64K); i += SZ_64K)
-		pci_ioremap_io(i, pcie->io.start + i);
-
-	mvebu_pcie_enable(pcie);
-
-	return 0;
+	list_splice_init(&pcie->resources, &bridge->windows);
+	bridge->dev.parent = dev;
+	bridge->sysdata = pcie;
+	bridge->busnr = 0;
+	bridge->ops = &mvebu_pcie_ops;
+	bridge->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
+	bridge->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle;
+	bridge->align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
+	bridge->msi = pcie->msi;
+
+	return pci_host_probe(bridge);
 }
 
 static const struct of_device_id mvebu_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
-- 
2.14.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge directly

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:10:06AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

[...]

> +	pcie->mem.name = "PCI MEM";
> +	pci_add_resource_offset(&pcie->resources, &pcie->mem, 0);

Nit: pci_add_resource() would do.

> +
> +	/* Get the PCIe IO aperture */
>  	mvebu_mbus_get_pcie_io_aperture(&pcie->io);
>  
>  	if (resource_size(&pcie->io) != 0) {
> @@ -1055,12 +1016,42 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	} else
>  		pcie->realio = pcie->io;
>  
> -	/* Get the bus range */
> -	ret = of_pci_parse_bus_range(np, &pcie->busn);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse bus-range property: %d\n", ret);
> +	pcie->realio.name = "PCI I/O";
> +
> +	if (resource_size(&pcie->realio) != 0)
> +		pci_add_resource_offset(&pcie->resources, &pcie->realio, 0);

Ditto.

> +
> +	ret = devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &pcie->resources);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = pci_remap_iospace(&pcie->realio, pcie->realio.start);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct mvebu_pcie *pcie;
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	int num, i, ret;
> +
> +	bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(struct mvebu_pcie));
> +	if (!bridge)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
> +	pcie->pdev = pdev;
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> +
> +	ret = mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources(pcie);
> +	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -	}
>  
>  	num = of_get_available_child_count(np);
>  
> @@ -1104,18 +1095,24 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		mvebu_pcie_setup_hw(port);
>  		mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr(port, 1);
>  		mvebu_pci_sw_bridge_init(port);
>  	}
>  
>  	pcie->nports = i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < (IO_SPACE_LIMIT - SZ_64K); i += SZ_64K)
> -		pci_ioremap_io(i, pcie->io.start + i);

Mmmm..I think that arch/arm let the mach override the mapping attributes
for MVEBU (for some platforms) so replacing this with
pci_remap_iospace() may trigger a regression, we need to investigate.

Also, I do not know why the loop above does not pay attention to the
real IO space resource size, whether that's on purpose or just a left
over.

Lorenzo

> -
> -	mvebu_pcie_enable(pcie);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	list_splice_init(&pcie->resources, &bridge->windows);
> +	bridge->dev.parent = dev;
> +	bridge->sysdata = pcie;
> +	bridge->busnr = 0;
> +	bridge->ops = &mvebu_pcie_ops;
> +	bridge->map_irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci;
> +	bridge->swizzle_irq = pci_common_swizzle;
> +	bridge->align_resource = mvebu_pcie_align_resource;
> +	bridge->msi = pcie->msi;
> +
> +	return pci_host_probe(bridge);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id mvebu_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> -- 
> 2.14.4
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge directly

[Thomas Petazzoni]

Hello Lorenzo,

Thanks for your review and feedback!

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:23:57 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:10:06AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +	pcie->mem.name = "PCI MEM";
> > +	pci_add_resource_offset(&pcie->resources, &pcie->mem, 0);  
> 
> Nit: pci_add_resource() would do.

Actually on this one, I wasn't sure of my conversion. The original
(i.e current) code is:

-	if (resource_size(&pcie->realio) != 0)
-		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->realio,
-					sys->io_offset);
-
-	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem, sys->mem_offset);
-	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pcie->busn);

I'm not sure what sys->io_offset and sys->mem_offset are. I dumped
them, they are both zero, and reading the ARM PCI code, I couldn't see
how they would be different than zero.

Is my understanding correct ?

> >  	pcie->nports = i;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < (IO_SPACE_LIMIT - SZ_64K); i += SZ_64K)
> > -		pci_ioremap_io(i, pcie->io.start + i);  
> 
> Mmmm..I think that arch/arm let the mach override the mapping attributes
> for MVEBU (for some platforms) so replacing this with
> pci_remap_iospace() may trigger a regression, we need to investigate.

Ah, that's a *very* good point. We do override the mapping attributes
on Armada 370/XP, in
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c#L177.

What is your preference ? We stick to pci_ioremap_io(), or we do
something to extend pci_remap_iospace() to cover this situation ?

In general, I like the current trend of having PCI be more like other
bus subsystems, where the code really is located in drivers/pci/, and
not spread across architectures in various arch/<foo>/ folders.

> Also, I do not know why the loop above does not pay attention to the
> real IO space resource size, whether that's on purpose or just a left
> over.

This code was added by me in commit
31e45ec3a4e73dcbeb51e03ab559812ba3e82cc2, which explains the rationale
behind this change. Since we're doing this at probe time, we have no
idea how much I/O space each PCI endpoint will require, and the Device
Tree binding for this PCI controller doesn't give the size of the I/O
space for each PCI port.

On this Marvell platforms, there are two indirections between the
virtual addresses and the actual access to the device:

  virtual address  -->  physical address  --> "MBus address"
                 ^^^^^^^                 ^^^^^^
                   MMU                  MBus windows

The pci_ioremap_io() configures the MMU, of course. But this is not
sufficient for the I/O space of a particular device to be accessible: a
MBus window has to be created. And those MBus window have a minimal
size of 64 KB anyway.

Therefore, calling pci_ioremap_io() with an hardcoded 64 KB is not a
big deal. It consumes a few more PTEs indeed, but that's about it: the
IO space will anyway be backed by a 64 KB MBus window, even if the PCI
endpoint actually uses less of that.

Does that make sense ? I suggest you have a look at the DT binding for
pci-mvebu to understand a bit more the whole thing.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/3] PCI: mvebu: Drop bogus comment above mvebu_pcie_map_registers()

[Thomas Petazzoni]

This comment has been there since the driver was introduced, but seems
to be a leftover from previous iterations of the driver. Indeed, we do
not lookup in a list to find the register ranges that matches the
given port/lane, as the "reg" property is in each sub-node
representing a PCI port. There is no lookup involved at all.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
index 6e801cef2c5f..e168f04565e7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -720,11 +720,6 @@ static resource_size_t mvebu_pcie_align_resource(struct pci_dev *dev,
 		return start;
 }
 
-/*
- * Looks up the list of register addresses encoded into the reg =
- * <...> property for one that matches the given port/lane. Once
- * found, maps it.
- */
 static void __iomem *mvebu_pcie_map_registers(struct platform_device *pdev,
 					      struct device_node *np,
 					      struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
-- 
2.14.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI: mvebu: cleanup and improvements

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:10:04AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The main goal of this series is to convert the pci-mvebu driver to use
> the pci_host_bridge API directly instead of using the ARM-specific
> pci_common_init_dev() API. After this series, the last remaining user
> of pci_common_init_dev() is pci-rcar-gen2.
> 
> I would appreciate some careful review of the MEM and IO resource
> related changes (i.e the new mvebu_pcie_parse_request_resources()
> function), since the mvebu driver is a bit special in that respect,
> and cannot use the standard devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()
> API.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> Thomas Petazzoni (3):
>   PCI: mvebu: Remove redundant platform_set_drvdata() call
>   PCI: mvebu: Convert to use pci_host_bridge directly
>   PCI: mvebu: Drop bogus comment above mvebu_pcie_map_registers()
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

Hi Thomas,

it does not apply cleanly to v4.18-rc1, can you please rebase it
and send it again so that I can apply it ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel