From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55720 "EHLO
        foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1730419AbeHISHO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:07:14 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:41:51 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
        Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM64, PCIe, annd ACPI
Message-ID: <20180809154151.GB20329@red-moon>
References: <89484aa0-08c4-0cff-500d-407d21e2f5fd@broadcom.com>
 <20180808093822.GA25150@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
 <a32a8761-f49f-f0cf-928b-0c323c2b540e@broadcom.com>
 <20180809085923.GA13428@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
 <9b5b5918-1492-df65-5b63-678b4a35ecb9@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <9b5b5918-1492-df65-5b63-678b4a35ecb9@broadcom.com>
Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-pci.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:57:52AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:

[...]

> >As I said ARM64 ACPI PCI kernel support is in the mainline today and I
> >am not willing to merge any more MCFG quirks at driver level - the
> >information is out there, it is public and must be followed, either
> >designers do that or no ACPI PCI support on your platform, sorry.
> >
> >Lorenzo
> >
> 
> I just want to make sure I interpret this properly. This means if
> the PCIe controller hardware does not support ECAM, there's pretty
> much no way around it with SW based workaround going forward with
> mainline kernel?

Yes.

> What about for the PCIe controller that was designed a few years back?

It will bootstrap with DT :)

Thanks,
Lorenzo