From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
poza@codeaurora.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@oracle.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/AER: prevent pcie_do_fatal_recovery from using device after it is removed
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:44:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821164413.GB18612@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37dc87b0-d0b1-8eb0-3eb9-ebccec6e4d77@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:50:54AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 8/21/2018 11:29 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > Hotplug driver needs to handle both physical removal as well as intermittent
> > > link down issues though.
> > Back to your patch you linked to earlier, your proposal is to have
> > pciehp wait for DEVSTS.FED before deciding if it needs to handle the
> > DLLSC event. That might be a start, but it isn't enough since that
> > status isn't set if the downstream device reported ERR_FATAL. I think
> > you'd need to check the secondary status register for a Received System
> > Error.
>
> Hmm, good feedback.
>
> I was trying not to mix AER/DPC with HP but obviously I failed.
> I can add a flag to struct pci_dev like aer_pending for AER.
>
> 1. AER ISR sets aer_pending
> 2. AER ISR issues a secondary bus reset
> 3. Hotplug driver bails out on aer_pending
> 4. AER ISR performs the recovery
>
> It is slightly more challenging on the DPC front as HW brings down
> the link automatically and hotplug driver can observe the link down
> event before the DPC ISR. I'll have to go check if DPC interrupt is
> pending.
>
> Let me know if this works out.
That sounds like a step in a good direction.
I think it's also safe to say the spec requires a slot capable of swapping
devices report the PDC slot event, so that should be valid criteria for
knowing if a hotplug event occured. There are other issues that we may
need to fix.
Consider a hierarchy of switches where the root port starts a DPC
event and the kernel tries to recover. Meanwhile devices downstream
switches lower in the hierarchy have changed. Since recovery doesn't do
re-enumeration and the top level downstream port didn't detect a hotplug
event, the recovery will "initialize" the wrong device to potentially
undefined results.
I think we'd need pciehp involved when error recovery rewalks the
downstream buses so pciehp may check PDC on capable ports. Implementing
'error_resume' in pciehp to de-enumerate/re-enumerate accordingly might
work ... If that happened, pciehp could call pcie_do_fatal_recovery()
and all three services could be unified!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-13 16:51 [PATCH 0/1] PCI/AER: prevent pcie_do_fatal_recovery from using device after it is removed Thomas Tai
2018-08-13 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Thomas Tai
2018-08-14 9:16 ` poza
2018-08-14 9:22 ` poza
2018-08-14 13:51 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-15 14:57 ` poza
2018-08-15 15:02 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-15 15:26 ` poza
2018-08-15 15:43 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-15 15:59 ` poza
2018-08-15 16:04 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-15 21:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-15 21:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 6:36 ` poza
2018-08-16 6:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 6:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 8:07 ` poza
2018-08-16 8:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 9:03 ` poza
2018-08-16 10:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 14:11 ` poza
2018-08-16 23:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17 10:29 ` poza
2018-08-17 10:44 ` poza
2018-08-18 7:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 7:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 7:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 7:56 ` poza
2018-08-16 8:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 8:05 ` poza
2018-08-16 8:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 8:22 ` poza
2018-08-16 8:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-16 13:30 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-16 13:46 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-16 23:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-17 6:35 ` poza
2018-08-19 2:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-20 5:09 ` poza
2018-08-20 5:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 13:02 ` Thomas Tai
2018-08-20 13:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-19 2:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-19 21:41 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-20 2:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 5:19 ` poza
2018-08-20 5:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 7:56 ` poza
2018-08-20 11:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 13:26 ` poza
2018-08-20 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 5:14 ` poza
2018-08-21 6:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-21 15:07 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-21 15:29 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-21 15:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-21 15:55 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-21 16:44 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-08-21 15:30 ` poza
2018-08-21 21:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 22:04 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-21 22:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-21 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 23:13 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-22 0:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-30 0:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-30 0:10 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-30 0:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-30 4:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 15:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-20 16:13 ` poza
2018-08-20 16:32 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-20 21:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 21:21 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-20 21:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-20 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 22:02 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-20 22:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 22:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-20 22:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-22 9:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-08-22 14:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-22 14:51 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-20 22:13 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-20 22:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 1:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-20 4:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-20 4:39 ` PATCH] Partial revert of "PCI/AER: Handle ERR_FATAL with removal and re-enumeration of devices" Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-08-21 19:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-22 4:35 ` poza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821164413.GB18612@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=thomas.tai@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).