From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, dledford@redhat.com,
"Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc 1/2] PCI: Fix faulty logic in pci_reset_bus()
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 15:30:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180904213043.GC350@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0658445a-5c73-1aba-31f9-6162fc69d5cc@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:16:13PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/4/2018 1:59 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:58:32AM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > > On 8/31/2018 10:34 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> > > > The pci_rest_bus() function calls into pci_probe_reset_slot() to determine
> > > > whether to call the slot or bus reset. The check has faulty logic in that
> > > > it does not account for pci_probe_reset_slot() being able to return an
> > > > errno. Fix by only calling the slot reset when the function returns 0.
> > > > Treat < 1 and > 1 the same.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Sinan Kaya<okaya@codeaurora.org>
> > > > Fixes: 811c5cb37df4 ("PCI: Unify try slot and bus reset API")
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl<michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro<dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Nit. Small typo on the first sentence (pci_rest_bus()).
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
> >
> > Bjorn,
> >
> > Are you OK to apply this series through the RDMA tree (for rc3), or do
> > you want to take it through PCI?
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10584277/
>
> Please don't apply the entire series yet. First patch is good to go.
>
> Second one is a hack. We are trying to find a better solution for the second
> patch.
Don't expect me to follow bugzilla too :|
I'll drop this series off patchworks then, resend when you have something..
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-31 17:33 [PATCH for-rc 0/2] IB/hfi1: PCI bug due to pci core changes Dennis Dalessandro
2018-08-31 17:34 ` [PATCH for-rc 1/2] PCI: Fix faulty logic in pci_reset_bus() Dennis Dalessandro
2018-08-31 17:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-04 20:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-09-04 21:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-04 21:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2018-09-04 21:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 17:34 ` [PATCH for-rc 2/2] IB/hfi1,PCI: Allow bus reset while probing Dennis Dalessandro
2018-09-12 2:46 ` [PATCH for-rc 0/2] IB/hfi1: PCI bug due to pci core changes Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180904213043.GC350@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).