linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>, Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@oracle.com>,
	poza@codeaurora.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] PCI/AER: Use managed resource allocations
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:17:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180925141733.GA11657@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fc055a6ead393b4adac20929291b7ca9ae959b6.camel@kernel.crashing.org>

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:13:42AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:58 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > This uses the managed device resource allocations for the service data
> > so that the aer driver doesn't need to manage it, further simplifying
> > this driver.
> 
> Just be careful (it migh be ok, I haven't audited everything, but I got
> bitten by something like that in the past) that the devm stuff will get
> disposed of in two cases:
> 
>  - The owner device going away (so far so good)
> 
>  - The owner device's driver being unbound
> 
> The latter is something not completely obvious, ie, even if the owner
> device still has held references, the successful completion of
> ->remove() on the driver will be followed by a cleanup of the managed
> stuff.
> 
> As I said, it might be ok in the AER case, but you might want to at
> least keep the set_service_data(dev, NULL) to make sure you don't leave
> a stale pointer there.

Yes, these resource methods should be considered carefully. I think
we're okay here, and didn't want to set service data to NULL for a
couple reasons:

 1. The service data and its device are released together, so the device
    is already out of scope before it could hold a stale pointer.

 2. It is possible the IRQ handler may be invoked after 'remove', but
    before the managed irq is torn down. Leaving the service data set
    while it is allocated removes a requirement to check for NULL on
    each interrupt.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18 23:58 [PATCH 00/12] error handling and pciehp maintenance Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 01/12] PCI: Set PCI bus accessors to noinline Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 02/12] PCI/AER: Covertly inject errors Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 03/12] PCI/AER: Reuse existing service device lookup Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 04/12] PCI/AER: Abstract AER interrupt handling Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 05/12] PCI/AER: Remove dead code Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 06/12] PCI/AER: Remove error source from aer struct Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 07/12] PCI/AER: Use kfifo for tracking events Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 08/12] PCI/AER: Use kfifo helper inserting locked elements Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 09/12] PCI/AER: Don't read upstream ports below fatal errors Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 10/12] PCI/AER: Use threaded IRQ for bottom half Keith Busch
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 11/12] PCI/AER: Use managed resource allocations Keith Busch
2018-09-19 16:29   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-19 17:25     ` Keith Busch
2018-09-19 17:36       ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-25  1:13   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-09-25 14:17     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-09-18 23:58 ` [PATCH 12/12] PCI/pciehp: Use device managed allocations Keith Busch
2018-09-19 15:11   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-09-19 16:17     ` Keith Busch
2018-09-22 18:10   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-24 23:43     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-25  7:13       ` Lukas Wunner
2018-10-04 21:40 ` [PATCH 00/12] error handling and pciehp maintenance Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-04 22:11   ` Keith Busch
2018-10-05 17:31     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-10-08 16:18       ` Keith Busch
2018-10-08 17:23         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-06 16:34         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-06 16:47           ` Keith Busch
2018-11-06 17:21             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-06 17:26               ` Keith Busch
2018-10-09 16:03       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180925141733.GA11657@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=okaya@kernel.org \
    --cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thomas.tai@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).