From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:59:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113145940.GA9827@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181113060510.GB182139@google.com>
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:05:11PM -0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:18:40PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> > It's the MSI-x masking that's our next highest contributor. Masking
> > vectors still requires non-posted commands, and since they're not
> > going through managed API accessors like config space uses, the
> > removed flag is needed for checking before doing significant MMIO.
>
> Sorry for digging up this ancient history, but do you remember where
> this MSI-X masking with non-posted commands happens? The masking is
> an MMIO write (posted) and there should only be a non-posted MMIO read
> if we use the msi_set_mask_bit() path.
>
> I'm looking at this path:
>
> nvme_pci_disable
> pci_free_irq_vectors
> pci_disable_msix
> pci_msix_shutdown
> if (pci_dev_is_disconnected()) # added by 0170591bb067
> return # (skip hw access)
> for_each_pci_msi_entry(...) # <-- loop
> __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq
> writel # <-- MMIO write
> pci_read_config_word(PCI_MSIX_FLAGS)
> pci_write_config_word(PCI_MSIX_FLAGS)
> free_msi_irqs
>
> whih only does MMIO *writes*, which I think are posted and do not
> require completion and should not cause timeouts. That's wasted
> effort, I agree, but it doesn't seem like it should be a performance
> issue.
>
> So there must be another path, probably preceding this one (since
> pci_disable_msix() cleans everything up), that masks the vectors and
> does the non-posted reads?
>
> The only places we do MMIO reads are msix_program_entries(), which is
> done at MSI-X enable time, and msi_set_mask_bit(), which is used in
> irq_chip.irq_mask() and irq_chip.irq_unmask() methods. But I haven't
> figured out where that irq_chip path is used in a loop.
I must have thought masking was a read-modify-write operation. It looks
like we're using a cached value so only posted commands needed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 22:58 [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access Keith Busch
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 1/3] pci: Add is_removed state Keith Busch
2016-10-31 10:41 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-12-13 20:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:07 ` Keith Busch
2016-12-14 2:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-14 2:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 2/3] pci: No config access for removed devices Keith Busch
2016-10-31 12:18 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-28 22:58 ` [PATCHv4 next 3/3] pci/msix: Skip disabling " Keith Busch
2016-10-31 11:00 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-10-31 13:54 ` Keith Busch
2016-12-13 21:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:01 ` Keith Busch
2016-11-18 23:25 ` [PATCHv4 next 0/3] Limiting pci access Keith Busch
2016-11-23 16:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-11-28 9:14 ` Wei Zhang
2016-11-28 10:22 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-11-28 18:02 ` Keith Busch
2016-12-08 17:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-08 19:32 ` Keith Busch
2016-12-12 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 0:55 ` Keith Busch
2016-12-13 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-12-13 23:18 ` Keith Busch
[not found] ` <B58D82457FDA0744A320A2FC5AC253B93D82F37D@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20170120213550.GA16618@localhost.localdomain>
2017-01-21 7:31 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-01-21 8:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-21 14:22 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-01-25 11:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-23 16:04 ` Keith Busch
2017-01-25 0:44 ` Austin.Bolen
2017-01-25 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-01-26 1:12 ` Austin.Bolen
2017-02-01 16:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-02-03 20:30 ` Austin.Bolen
2017-02-03 20:39 ` Greg KH
2017-02-03 21:43 ` Austin.Bolen
2017-01-25 11:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-28 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-13 6:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-11-13 14:59 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113145940.GA9827@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=wzhang@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).