From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Roy Shterman <roys@lightbitslabs.com>,
Ofer Hayut <ofer@lightbitslabs.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Questions about pci_bridge_check_ranges()
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:39:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127223901.GD6401@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34458c2d-0faf-e9c1-55fd-7ade553a2b45@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 02:22:48PM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rescan process, pci bridge regions capabilities are
> re-verified. In particular, prefetchable regions are checked for 64-bit
> addressing support. This check is done by reading the base-address
> register 4 LSBs.
>
> Then, we "double check" that the bridge support 64-bit prefetchable
> addresses. This double-check is done by writing ones to the base-address
> buffer (high 32-bit), and check if we read zeros [1].
>
> Questions:
> 1. Why do we need to "double-check"?
> 2. What is expected to happen if a memory transaction arrive to this
> port during this process, while its base-address is miss-configured?
> (say, a read-transaction issued by a peer device)
I think has something to do with how pbus_size_mem() assumes a
64-bit window will not have a 32-bit resource. If a bridge has a
prefetchable window, but happens to contain an address < 4GB, we clear
the IORESOURCE_MEM_64 flag so that it can get a resource.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-27 22:22 Questions about pci_bridge_check_ranges() Sagi Grimberg
2018-11-27 22:39 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-12-10 8:49 ` Ofer Hayut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181127223901.GD6401@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ofer@lightbitslabs.com \
--cc=roys@lightbitslabs.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).