linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: dwc: Remove Keystone specific dw_pcie_host_ops
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:26:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190207212622.GO7268@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207110924.30716-9-kishon@ti.com>

On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:39:23PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Now that Keystone started using it's own msi_irq_chip, remove
> Keystone specific callback function defined in dw_pcie_host_ops.

s/it's/its/
s/callback function/callback functions/

> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
> ---
>  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 45 ++++++-------------
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |  5 ---
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 042de09b0451..9492b05e8ff0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -126,18 +126,12 @@ static void dw_pci_setup_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>  	u64 msi_target;
>  
> -	if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
> -		msi_target = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
> -	else
> -		msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
> +	msi_target = (u64)pp->msi_data;
>  
>  	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_target);
>  	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_target);
>  
> -	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
> -		msg->data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, data->hwirq);
> -	else
> -		msg->data = data->hwirq;
> +	msg->data = data->hwirq;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(pci->dev, "msi#%d address_hi %#x address_lo %#x\n",
>  		(int)data->hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo);
> @@ -157,17 +151,13 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_mask(struct irq_data *data)
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>  
> -	if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq) {
> -		pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
> -	} else {
> -		ctrl = data->hwirq / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> -		res = ctrl * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE;
> -		bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> +	ctrl = data->hwirq / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> +	res = ctrl * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE;
> +	bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
>  
> -		pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
> -		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4,
> -				    ~pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
> -	}
> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] &= ~(1 << bit);
> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4,
> +			    ~pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>  
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>  }
> @@ -180,17 +170,13 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
>  
> -	if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq) {
> -		pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, data->hwirq);
> -	} else {
> -		ctrl = data->hwirq / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> -		res = ctrl * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE;
> -		bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> +	ctrl = data->hwirq / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> +	res = ctrl * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE;
> +	bit = data->hwirq % MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
>  
> -		pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
> -		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4,
> -				    ~pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
> -	}
> +	pp->irq_status[ctrl] |= 1 << bit;
> +	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK + res, 4,
> +			    ~pp->irq_status[ctrl]);
>  
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>  }
> @@ -209,9 +195,6 @@ static void dw_pci_bottom_ack(struct irq_data *d)
>  
>  	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS + res, 4, 1 << bit);
>  
> -	if (pp->ops->msi_irq_ack)
> -		pp->ops->msi_irq_ack(d->hwirq, pp);
> -
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 95e0c3c93f48..ea4b215b605d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -142,14 +142,9 @@ struct dw_pcie_host_ops {
>  	int (*wr_other_conf)(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
>  			     unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 val);
>  	int (*host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> -	void (*msi_set_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
> -	void (*msi_clear_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
> -	phys_addr_t (*get_msi_addr)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> -	u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp, int pos);

I don't see the whole series on linux-pci (I only see patches 2, 6, 8, 9),
but I expected to somewhere see the removal of assignments to these
pointers.  It would be easier to review if the removal of assignments and
the removal of the function pointers from the structure were in the same
patch, but maybe that's not really feasible.

>  	void (*scan_bus)(struct pcie_port *pp);
>  	void (*set_num_vectors)(struct pcie_port *pp);
>  	int (*msi_host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp);
> -	void (*msi_irq_ack)(int irq, struct pcie_port *pp);
>  };
>  
>  struct pcie_port {
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-07 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-07 11:09 [PATCH v2 0/9] PCI: DWC/Keystone: MSI configuration cleanup Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] PCI: keystone: Cleanup interrupt related macros Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] PCI: keystone: Modify legacy_irq_handler to check the IRQ_STATUS of INTA/B/C/D Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 16:15   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:32     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 20:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-08 11:09     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] PCI: keystone: Add separate functions for configuring MSI and legacy interrupt Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 15:44   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:33     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] PCI: keystone: Use hwirq to get the IRQ number offset Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] PCI: keystone: Cleanup ks_pcie_msi_irq_handler and ks_pcie_legacy_irq_handler Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] PCI: dwc: Add support to use non default msi_irq_chip Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 16:48   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-08  4:46     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08 10:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-02-07 20:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI: keystone: Use Keystone specific msi_irq_chip Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: dwc: Remove Keystone specific dw_pcie_host_ops Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-07 18:45   ` Trent Piepho
2019-02-07 21:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-02-08  5:13     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-02-08 14:05       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] PCI: dwc: Do not write to MSI control registers if the platform doesn't use it Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190207212622.GO7268@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).