From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] genirq/affinity: don't mark 'affd' as const
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:04:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213150407.GB96272@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213105041.13537-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 06:50:37PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Currently all parameters in 'affd' are read-only, so 'affd' is marked
> as const in both pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() and irq_create_affinity_masks().
s/all parameters in 'affd'/the contents of '*affd'/
> We have to ask driver to re-caculate set vectors after the whole IRQ
> vectors are allocated later, and the result needs to be stored in 'affd'.
> Also both the two interfaces are core APIs, which should be trusted.
s/re-caculate/recalculate/
s/stored in 'affd'/stored in '*affd'/
s/both the two/both/
This is a little confusing because you're talking about both "IRQ
vectors" and these other "set vectors", which I think are different
things. I assume the "set vectors" are cpumasks showing the affinity
of the IRQ vectors with some CPUs?
AFAICT, *this* patch doesn't add anything that writes to *affd. I
think the removal of "const" should be in the same patch that makes
the removal necessary.
> So don't mark 'affd' as const both pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() and
> irq_create_affinity_masks().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/pci.h | 4 ++--
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 4c0b47867258..96978459e2a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int populate_msi_sysfs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> }
>
> static struct msi_desc *
> -msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> +msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> struct irq_affinity_desc *masks = NULL;
> struct msi_desc *entry;
> @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int msi_verify_entries(struct pci_dev *dev)
> * which could have been allocated.
> */
> static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec,
> - const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> struct msi_desc *entry;
> int ret;
> @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static void __iomem *msix_map_region(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned nr_entries)
>
> static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base,
> struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec,
> - const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> struct irq_affinity_desc *curmsk, *masks = NULL;
> struct msi_desc *entry;
> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static void msix_program_entries(struct pci_dev *dev,
> * requested MSI-X entries with allocated irqs or non-zero for otherwise.
> **/
> static int msix_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
> - int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int ret;
> u16 control;
> @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ int pci_msix_vec_count(struct pci_dev *dev)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_msix_vec_count);
>
> static int __pci_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries,
> - int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int nr_entries;
> int i, j;
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ int pci_msi_enabled(void)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_msi_enabled);
>
> static int __pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec, int maxvec,
> - const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int nvec;
> int rc;
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msi);
>
> static int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
> struct msix_entry *entries, int minvec,
> - int maxvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + int maxvec, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int rc, nvec = maxvec;
>
> @@ -1165,9 +1165,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix_range);
> */
> int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags,
> - const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> + struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> - static const struct irq_affinity msi_default_affd;
> + struct irq_affinity msi_default_affd = {0};
> int msix_vecs = -ENOSPC;
> int msi_vecs = -ENOSPC;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> index 7c9434652f36..1ed1014c9684 100644
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ extern int
> irq_set_affinity_notifier(unsigned int irq, struct irq_affinity_notify *notify);
>
> struct irq_affinity_desc *
> -irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd);
> +irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvec, struct irq_affinity *affd);
>
> int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(int minvec, int maxvec, const struct irq_affinity *affd);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 40b327b814aa..4eca42cf611b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static inline int pci_enable_msix_exact(struct pci_dev *dev,
> }
> int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags,
> - const struct irq_affinity *affd);
> + struct irq_affinity *affd);
>
> void pci_free_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int pci_irq_vector(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int nr);
> @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ static inline int pci_enable_msix_exact(struct pci_dev *dev,
> static inline int
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
> unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags,
> - const struct irq_affinity *aff_desc)
> + struct irq_affinity *aff_desc)
> {
> if ((flags & PCI_IRQ_LEGACY) && min_vecs == 1 && dev->irq)
> return 1;
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index 118b66d64a53..9200d3b26f7d 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> * Returns the irq_affinity_desc pointer or NULL if allocation failed.
> */
> struct irq_affinity_desc *
> -irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
> +irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> {
> int affvecs = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
> int curvec, usedvecs;
> --
> 2.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-13 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 10:50 [PATCH V3 0/5] genirq/affinity: add .calc_sets for improving IRQ allocation & spread Ming Lei
2019-02-13 10:50 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] genirq/affinity: don't mark 'affd' as const Ming Lei
2019-02-13 15:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-02-13 20:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-13 21:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-02-13 21:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-13 22:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-02-14 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 13:04 ` 陈华才
2019-02-14 13:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-19 0:42 ` 陈华才
2019-02-19 6:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-19 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2019-02-13 10:50 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] genirq/affinity: store irq set vectors in 'struct irq_affinity' Ming Lei
2019-02-13 15:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-13 10:50 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] genirq/affinity: add new callback for caculating set vectors Ming Lei
2019-02-13 15:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-13 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-13 10:50 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] nvme-pci: avoid irq allocation retrying via .calc_sets Ming Lei
2019-02-13 15:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-13 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-13 10:50 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] genirq/affinity: Document .calc_sets as required in case of multiple sets Ming Lei
2019-02-13 15:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-02-13 14:36 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] genirq/affinity: add .calc_sets for improving IRQ allocation & spread Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190213150407.GB96272@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).