[PATCH v2 6/9] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check

Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-07-12T17:01:31Z

list_for_each_entry_rcu now has support to check for RCU reader sections
as well as lock. Just use the support in it, instead of explictly
checking in the caller.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9657315405de..5e88449bdd83 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -363,11 +363,6 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")

-#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
- "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
-
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
@@ -424,9 +419,8 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
* ignored.
*/
#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
- list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \
- if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \
- else
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \
+ lock_is_held(&(wq->mutex).dep_map))

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK

--
2.22.0.510.g264f2c817a-goog