linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Christian Koenig" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Eric Pilmore" <epilmore@gigaio.com>,
	"Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com>,
	"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out __upstream_bridge_distance()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:35:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730163545.4915-5-logang@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190730163545.4915-1-logang@deltatee.com>

This is a prep patch to create a second level helper. There are no
functional changes.

The root complex whitelist code will be moved into this function in
a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
---
 drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
index 64f5a0e30244..b4ef6e8da784 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
@@ -303,47 +303,9 @@ enum {
 	P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED		= 0x08000000,
 };
 
-/*
- * Find the distance through the nearest common upstream bridge between
- * two PCI devices.
- *
- * If the two devices are the same device then 0 will be returned.
- *
- * If there are two virtual functions of the same device behind the same
- * bridge port then 2 will be returned (one step down to the PCIe switch,
- * then one step back to the same device).
- *
- * In the case where two devices are connected to the same PCIe switch, the
- * value 4 will be returned. This corresponds to the following PCI tree:
- *
- *     -+  Root Port
- *      \+ Switch Upstream Port
- *       +-+ Switch Downstream Port
- *       + \- Device A
- *       \-+ Switch Downstream Port
- *         \- Device B
- *
- * The distance is 4 because we traverse from Device A through the downstream
- * port of the switch, to the common upstream port, back up to the second
- * downstream port and then to Device B.
- *
- * Any two devices that cannot communicate using p2pdma will return the distance
- * with the flag P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED.
- *
- * Any two devices that have a data path that goes through the host bridge
- * will consult a whitelist. If the host bridges are on the whitelist,
- * then the distance will be returned with the flag P2PDMA_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE set.
- * If either bridge is not on the whitelist, the flag P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED will
- * be set.
- *
- * If a bridge which has any ACS redirection bits set is in the path
- * then this functions will flag the result with P2PDMA_ACS_FORCES_UPSTREAM.
- * In this case, a list of all infringing bridge addresses will be
- * populated in acs_list (assuming it's non-null) for printk purposes.
- */
-static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *provider,
-				    struct pci_dev *client,
-				    struct seq_buf *acs_list)
+static int __upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *provider,
+				      struct pci_dev *client,
+				      struct seq_buf *acs_list)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *a = provider, *b = client, *bb;
 	int dist_a = 0;
@@ -409,6 +371,51 @@ static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *provider,
 	return dist_a + dist_b;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Find the distance through the nearest common upstream bridge between
+ * two PCI devices.
+ *
+ * If the two devices are the same device then 0 will be returned.
+ *
+ * If there are two virtual functions of the same device behind the same
+ * bridge port then 2 will be returned (one step down to the PCIe switch,
+ * then one step back to the same device).
+ *
+ * In the case where two devices are connected to the same PCIe switch, the
+ * value 4 will be returned. This corresponds to the following PCI tree:
+ *
+ *     -+  Root Port
+ *      \+ Switch Upstream Port
+ *       +-+ Switch Downstream Port
+ *       + \- Device A
+ *       \-+ Switch Downstream Port
+ *         \- Device B
+ *
+ * The distance is 4 because we traverse from Device A through the downstream
+ * port of the switch, to the common upstream port, back up to the second
+ * downstream port and then to Device B.
+ *
+ * Any two devices that cannot communicate using p2pdma will return the distance
+ * with the flag P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED.
+ *
+ * Any two devices that have a data path that goes through the host bridge
+ * will consult a whitelist. If the host bridges are on the whitelist,
+ * then the distance will be returned with the flag P2PDMA_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE set.
+ * If either bridge is not on the whitelist, the flag P2PDMA_NOT_SUPPORTED will
+ * be set.
+ *
+ * If a bridge which has any ACS redirection bits set is in the path
+ * then this functions will flag the result with P2PDMA_ACS_FORCES_UPSTREAM.
+ * In this case, a list of all infringing bridge addresses will be
+ * populated in acs_list (assuming it's non-null) for printk purposes.
+ */
+static int upstream_bridge_distance(struct pci_dev *provider,
+				    struct pci_dev *client,
+				    struct seq_buf *acs_list)
+{
+	return __upstream_bridge_distance(provider, client, acs_list);
+}
+
 static int upstream_bridge_distance_warn(struct pci_dev *provider,
 					 struct pci_dev *client)
 {
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-30 16:35 [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce private pagemap structure Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add the provider's pci_dev to the pci_p2pdma_pagemap struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add constants for not-supported result upstream_bridge_distance() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 15:58     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-08  7:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 15:58         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Apply host bridge white list for ACS Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out host_bridge_whitelist() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add whitelist support for Intel Host Bridges Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Add attrs argument to pci_p2pdma_map_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce pci_p2pdma_unmap_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Factor out __pci_p2pdma_map_sg() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Store mapping method in an xarray Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] PCI/P2PDMA: dma_map P2PDMA map requests that traverse the host bridge Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] PCI/P2PDMA: No longer require no-mmu for host bridge whitelist Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07  5:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 12:43     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08  7:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-30 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Update documentation for pci_p2pdma_distance_many() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-06 23:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Support transactions that hit the host bridge Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-07  0:31   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-08-07 19:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730163545.4915-5-logang@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=epilmore@gigaio.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).