public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
	Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	stefan.maetje@esd.eu, Patrick Talbert <ptalbert@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Frederick Lawler <fred@fredlawl.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Get rid of dev->has_secondary_link flag
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 16:12:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822131232.GQ30120@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822085553.62697-2-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:55:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> In order to solve a problem on a system where PCIe switch upstream port
> incorrectly identifies itself as downstream port commit d0751b98dfa3
> ("PCI: Add dev->has_secondary_link to track downstream PCIe links")
> introduced a flag to struct pci_dev that can be used to determine which
> side of the port the link is.
> 
> The problem with this approach is that each time caller wants to
> determine whether the port is upstream or downstream, it may need to
> look at the dev->has_secondary_link as well. Making the calling code
> unnecessary complicated.
> 
> Instead of this, we can correct the type of the port itself so that
> pci_pcie_type() returns the actual type regardless of what the port
> claims it is. Then update the users to call pci_pcie_type() and
> pcie_downstream_port() accordingly.
> 
> This allows us to remove dev->has_secondary_flag completely.

Looks better and cleaner now. FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20190703133953.GK128603@google.com/
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> I haven't been able to test this properly since I don't have access to any
> system having the issue. I tried on a couple of systems without the issue
> and did not see any problems, though.
> 
> @Robert, as the reporter of the original issue if you still have access to
> any of these systems I would appreciate if you could give this patch series
> a try.
> 
>  drivers/pci/pci.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c |  8 +++----
>  drivers/pci/pcie/err.c  |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/probe.c     | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/pci/vc.c        |  4 +++-
>  include/linux/pci.h     |  1 -
>  6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 9ac50710f1d4..3c0672f1dfe7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3577,7 +3577,7 @@ int pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Ensure upstream ports don't block AtomicOps on egress */
> -		if (!bridge->has_secondary_link) {
> +		if (pci_pcie_type(bridge) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
>  			pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
>  						   &ctl2);
>  			if (ctl2 & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_ATOMIC_EGRESS_BLOCK)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 464f8f92653f..2776d34be693 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -913,10 +913,10 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We allocate pcie_link_state for the component on the upstream
> -	 * end of a Link, so there's nothing to do unless this device has a
> -	 * Link on its secondary side.
> +	 * end of a Link, so there's nothing to do unless this device is
> +	 * downstream port.
>  	 */
> -	if (!pdev->has_secondary_link)
> +	if (!pcie_downstream_port(pdev))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* VIA has a strange chipset, root port is under a bridge */
> @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem)
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (pdev->has_secondary_link)
> +	if (pcie_downstream_port(pdev))
>  		parent = pdev;
>  	if (!parent || !parent->link_state)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> index 773197a12568..b0e6048a9208 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 service)
>  	driver = pcie_port_find_service(dev, service);
>  	if (driver && driver->reset_link) {
>  		status = driver->reset_link(dev);
> -	} else if (dev->has_secondary_link) {
> +	} else if (pcie_downstream_port(dev)) {
>  		status = default_reset_link(dev);
>  	} else {
>  		pci_printk(KERN_DEBUG, dev, "no link-reset support at upstream device %s\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index a3c7338fad86..01752a63cd15 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1431,26 +1431,38 @@ void set_pcie_port_type(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &reg16);
>  	pdev->pcie_mpss = reg16 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PAYLOAD;
>  
> +	parent = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> +	if (!parent)
> +		return;
> +
>  	/*
> -	 * A Root Port or a PCI-to-PCIe bridge is always the upstream end
> -	 * of a Link.  No PCIe component has two Links.  Two Links are
> -	 * connected by a Switch that has a Port on each Link and internal
> -	 * logic to connect the two Ports.
> +	 * Some systems do not identify their upstream/downstream ports
> +	 * correctly so detect impossible configurations here and correct
> +	 * the port type accordingly.
>  	 */
>  	type = pci_pcie_type(pdev);
> -	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> -	    type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCIE_BRIDGE)
> -		pdev->has_secondary_link = 1;
> -	else if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM ||
> -		 type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
> -		parent = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> -
> +	if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Usually there's an upstream device (Root Port or Switch
> -		 * Downstream Port), but we can't assume one exists.
> +		 * If pdev claims to be downstream port but the parent
> +		 * device is also downstream port assume pdev is actually
> +		 * upstream port.
>  		 */
> -		if (parent && !parent->has_secondary_link)
> -			pdev->has_secondary_link = 1;
> +		if (pcie_downstream_port(parent)) {
> +			pci_info(pdev, "claims to be downstream port but is acting as upstream port, correcting type\n");
> +			pdev->pcie_flags_reg &= ~PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE;
> +			pdev->pcie_flags_reg |= PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM;
> +		}
> +	} else if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If pdev claims to be upstream port but the parent
> +		 * device is also upstream port assume pdev is actually
> +		 * downstream port.
> +		 */
> +		if (pci_pcie_type(parent) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +			pci_info(pdev, "claims to be upstream port but is acting as downstream port, correcting type\n");
> +			pdev->pcie_flags_reg &= ~PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE;
> +			pdev->pcie_flags_reg |= PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM;
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -2764,12 +2776,8 @@ static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  	 * A PCIe Downstream Port normally leads to a Link with only Device
>  	 * 0 on it (PCIe spec r3.1, sec 7.3.1).  As an optimization, scan
>  	 * only for Device 0 in that situation.
> -	 *
> -	 * Checking has_secondary_link is a hack to identify Downstream
> -	 * Ports because sometimes Switches are configured such that the
> -	 * PCIe Port Type labels are backwards.
>  	 */
> -	if (bridge && pci_is_pcie(bridge) && bridge->has_secondary_link)
> +	if (bridge && pci_is_pcie(bridge) && pcie_downstream_port(bridge))
>  		return 1;
>  
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/vc.c b/drivers/pci/vc.c
> index 5acd9c02683a..9ae9fb9339e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/vc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/vc.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> +#include "pci.h"
> +
>  /**
>   * pci_vc_save_restore_dwords - Save or restore a series of dwords
>   * @dev: device
> @@ -105,7 +107,7 @@ static void pci_vc_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, int res)
>  	struct pci_dev *link = NULL;
>  
>  	/* Enable VCs from the downstream device */
> -	if (!dev->has_secondary_link)
> +	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) || !pcie_downstream_port(dev))
>  		return;
>  
>  	ctrl_pos = pos + PCI_VC_RES_CTRL + (res * PCI_CAP_VC_PER_VC_SIZEOF);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 82e4cd1b7ac3..2f8990246316 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ struct pci_dev {
>  	unsigned int	broken_intx_masking:1;	/* INTx masking can't be used */
>  	unsigned int	io_window_1k:1;		/* Intel bridge 1K I/O windows */
>  	unsigned int	irq_managed:1;
> -	unsigned int	has_secondary_link:1;
>  	unsigned int	non_compliant_bars:1;	/* Broken BARs; ignore them */
>  	unsigned int	is_probed:1;		/* Device probing in progress */
>  	unsigned int	link_active_reporting:1;/* Device capable of reporting link active */
> -- 
> 2.23.0.rc1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  8:55 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Make pcie_downstream_port() available outside of access.c Mika Westerberg
2019-08-22  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Get rid of dev->has_secondary_link flag Mika Westerberg
2019-08-22 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2019-09-07 16:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-22 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Make pcie_downstream_port() available outside of access.c Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190822131232.GQ30120@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fred@fredlawl.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=ptalbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=rwhite@pobox.com \
    --cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.maetje@esd.eu \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox