From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Abhishek Shah <abhishek.shah@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: iproc: Invalidate PAXB address mapping before programming it
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:43:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015164303.GC25674@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906035813.24046-1-abhishek.shah@broadcom.com>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:28:13AM +0530, Abhishek Shah wrote:
> Invalidate PAXB inbound/outbound address mapping each time before
> programming it. This is helpful for the cases where we need to
> reprogram inbound/outbound address mapping without resetting PAXB.
> kexec kernel is one such example.
This looks like a hack, explain to us please what it actually solves and
why a full reset is not necessary.
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Shah <abhishek.shah@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vikram Mysore Prakash <vikram.prakash@broadcom.com>
Patches are reviewed on public mailing lists, remove tags given
on internal reviews - they are not relevant.
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> index e3ca46497470..99a9521ba7ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc.c
> @@ -1245,6 +1245,32 @@ static int iproc_pcie_map_dma_ranges(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void iproc_pcie_invalidate_mapping(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> + struct iproc_pcie_ib *ib = &pcie->ib;
> + struct iproc_pcie_ob *ob = &pcie->ob;
> + int idx;
> +
> + if (pcie->ep_is_internal)
What's this check for and why leaving mappings in place is safe for
this category of IPs ?
> + return;
> +
> + if (pcie->need_ob_cfg) {
> + /* iterate through all OARR mapping regions */
> + for (idx = ob->nr_windows - 1; idx >= 0; idx--) {
> + iproc_pcie_write_reg(pcie,
> + MAP_REG(IPROC_PCIE_OARR0, idx), 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (pcie->need_ib_cfg) {
> + /* iterate through all IARR mapping regions */
> + for (idx = 0; idx < ib->nr_regions; idx++) {
> + iproc_pcie_write_reg(pcie,
> + MAP_REG(IPROC_PCIE_IARR0, idx), 0);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int iproce_pcie_get_msi(struct iproc_pcie *pcie,
> struct device_node *msi_node,
> u64 *msi_addr)
> @@ -1517,6 +1543,8 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
> iproc_pcie_perst_ctrl(pcie, true);
> iproc_pcie_perst_ctrl(pcie, false);
>
> + iproc_pcie_invalidate_mapping(pcie);
It makes more sense to call this in the .shutdown() method if I
understand what it does.
Lorenzo
> if (pcie->need_ob_cfg) {
> ret = iproc_pcie_map_ranges(pcie, res);
> if (ret) {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 3:58 [PATCH 1/1] PCI: iproc: Invalidate PAXB address mapping before programming it Abhishek Shah
2019-09-06 8:38 ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-06 9:25 ` Abhishek Shah
2019-09-06 10:01 ` Andrew Murray
2019-09-06 14:11 ` Abhishek Shah
2019-09-24 3:28 ` Abhishek Shah
2019-10-15 16:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-10-17 14:27 ` Abhishek Shah
2019-10-21 10:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-24 3:22 ` Abhishek Shah
2019-10-24 8:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-25 9:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015164303.GC25674@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=abhishek.shah@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).