From: "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"logang@deltatee.com" <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] PCI: Allow extend_bridge_window() to shrink resource if necessary
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:07:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191030120705.GC2593@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SL2P216MB018739B339B453DE872DB71E80610@SL2P216MB0187.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 03:29:21PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> Remove checks for resource size in extend_bridge_window(). This is
> necessary to allow the pci_bus_distribute_available_resources() to
> function when the kernel parameter pci=hpmemsize=nn[KMG] is used to
> allocate resources. Because the kernel parameter sets the size of all
> hotplug bridges to be the same, there are problems when nested hotplug
> bridges are encountered. Fitting a downstream hotplug bridge with size X
> and normal bridges with non-zero size Y into parent hotplug bridge with
> size X is impossible, and hence the downstream hotplug bridge needs to
> shrink to fit into its parent.
>
> Add check for if bridge is extended or shrunken and adjust pci_dbg to
> reflect this.
>
> Reset the resource if its new size is zero (if we have run out of a
> bridge window resource) to prevent the PCI resource assignment code from
> attempting to assign a zero-sized resource.
>
> Rename extend_bridge_window() to adjust_bridge_window() to reflect the
> fact that the window can now shrink.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au>
> ---
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index fe8b2c715..f8cd54584 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -1814,7 +1814,7 @@ void __init pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static void extend_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *bridge, struct resource *res,
> +static void adjust_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *bridge, struct resource *res,
> struct list_head *add_list,
> resource_size_t new_size)
> {
> @@ -1823,13 +1823,20 @@ static void extend_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *bridge, struct resource *res,
> if (res->parent)
> return;
>
> - if (resource_size(res) >= new_size)
> - return;
> + if (new_size > resource_size(res)) {
> + add_size = new_size - resource_size(res);
> + pci_dbg(bridge, "bridge window %pR extended by %pa\n", res,
> + &add_size);
> + } else if (new_size < resource_size(res)) {
> + add_size = resource_size(res) - new_size;
> + pci_dbg(bridge, "bridge window %pR shrunken by %pa\n", res,
> + &add_size);
> + }
Do we need to care about new_size == resource_size(res)?
Also there are several calls of resource_size(res) above so probably
worth storing it into a helper variable.
> - add_size = new_size - resource_size(res);
> - pci_dbg(bridge, "bridge window %pR extended by %pa\n", res, &add_size);
> res->end = res->start + new_size - 1;
> remove_from_list(add_list, res);
> + if (!new_size)
> + reset_resource(res);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-29 15:29 [PATCH v9 4/4] PCI: Allow extend_bridge_window() to shrink resource if necessary Nicholas Johnson
2019-10-30 12:07 ` mika.westerberg [this message]
2019-10-30 13:22 ` Nicholas Johnson
2019-10-30 13:27 ` mika.westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191030120705.GC2593@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=nicholas.johnson-opensource@outlook.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).