linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@marvell.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@marvell.com>, Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Abhinav Ratna <abhinav.ratna@broadcom.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Make ACS quirk implementations more uniform
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:06:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114220601.261647-2-helgaas@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114220601.261647-1-helgaas@kernel.org>

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

The ACS quirks differ in needless ways, which makes them look more
different than they really are.

Reorder the ACS flags in order of definitions in the spec:

  PCI_ACS_SV   Source Validation
  PCI_ACS_TB   Translation Blocking
  PCI_ACS_RR   P2P Request Redirect
  PCI_ACS_CR   P2P Completion Redirect
  PCI_ACS_UF   Upstream Forwarding
  PCI_ACS_EC   P2P Egress Control
  PCI_ACS_DT   Direct Translated P2P

(PCIe r5.0, sec 7.7.8.2) and use similar code structure in all.  No
functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 drivers/pci/quirks.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index 2544e210b984..59f73d084e1d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -4366,18 +4366,18 @@ static bool pci_quirk_cavium_acs_match(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 static int pci_quirk_cavium_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
 {
+	if (!pci_quirk_cavium_acs_match(dev))
+		return -ENOTTY;
+
 	/*
-	 * Cavium root ports don't advertise an ACS capability.  However,
+	 * Cavium Root Ports don't advertise an ACS capability.  However,
 	 * the RTL internally implements similar protection as if ACS had
-	 * Request Redirection, Completion Redirection, Source Validation,
+	 * Source Validation, Request Redirection, Completion Redirection,
 	 * and Upstream Forwarding features enabled.  Assert that the
 	 * hardware implements and enables equivalent ACS functionality for
 	 * these flags.
 	 */
-	acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_UF);
-
-	if (!pci_quirk_cavium_acs_match(dev))
-		return -ENOTTY;
+	acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF);
 
 	return acs_flags ? 0 : 1;
 }
@@ -4395,7 +4395,7 @@ static int pci_quirk_xgene_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
 }
 
 /*
- * Many Intel PCH root ports do provide ACS-like features to disable peer
+ * Many Intel PCH Root Ports do provide ACS-like features to disable peer
  * transactions and validate bus numbers in requests, but do not provide an
  * actual PCIe ACS capability.  This is the list of device IDs known to fall
  * into that category as provided by Intel in Red Hat bugzilla 1037684.
@@ -4443,37 +4443,34 @@ static bool pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs_match(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	return false;
 }
 
-#define INTEL_PCH_ACS_FLAGS (PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_SV)
+#define INTEL_PCH_ACS_FLAGS (PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF)
 
 static int pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
 {
-	u16 flags = dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ACS_ENABLED_QUIRK ?
-		    INTEL_PCH_ACS_FLAGS : 0;
-
 	if (!pci_quirk_intel_pch_acs_match(dev))
 		return -ENOTTY;
 
-	return acs_flags & ~flags ? 0 : 1;
+	if (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ACS_ENABLED_QUIRK)
+		acs_flags &= ~(INTEL_PCH_ACS_FLAGS);
+
+	return acs_flags ? 0 : 1;
 }
 
 /*
- * These QCOM root ports do provide ACS-like features to disable peer
+ * These QCOM Root Ports do provide ACS-like features to disable peer
  * transactions and validate bus numbers in requests, but do not provide an
  * actual PCIe ACS capability.  Hardware supports source validation but it
  * will report the issue as Completer Abort instead of ACS Violation.
- * Hardware doesn't support peer-to-peer and each root port is a root
- * complex with unique segment numbers.  It is not possible for one root
- * port to pass traffic to another root port.  All PCIe transactions are
- * terminated inside the root port.
+ * Hardware doesn't support peer-to-peer and each Root Port is a Root
+ * Complex with unique segment numbers.  It is not possible for one Root
+ * Port to pass traffic to another Root Port.  All PCIe transactions are
+ * terminated inside the Root Port.
  */
 static int pci_quirk_qcom_rp_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
 {
-	u16 flags = (PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF | PCI_ACS_SV);
-	int ret = acs_flags & ~flags ? 0 : 1;
-
-	pci_info(dev, "Using QCOM ACS Quirk (%d)\n", ret);
+	acs_flags &= ~(PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF);
 
-	return ret;
+	return acs_flags ? 0 : 1;
 }
 
 static int pci_quirk_al_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
-- 
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-14 22:05 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Unify ACS quirks Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-14 22:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-11-14 22:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Unify ACS quirk desired vs provided checking Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-14 22:17   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-11-14 22:25   ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-20 13:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Unify ACS quirks Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114220601.261647-2-helgaas@kernel.org \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=abhinav.ratna@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=fkan@apm.com \
    --cc=george.cherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=rrichter@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).