From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C054FC433DF for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD9820727 for ; Fri, 15 May 2020 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726497AbgEORTu (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2020 13:19:50 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:49774 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726023AbgEORTu (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2020 13:19:50 -0400 IronPort-SDR: fNpcD1fy91Q7ZVeSifuAu3Gb2+7juBFTef8SnJxNW1UdTRBxPAja17QXREOerwYNYTft0ePNsF Y7jim3BQIPIQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2020 10:19:49 -0700 IronPort-SDR: eZEoXLPhr5Cv4k9IWYM8gN4137BapxcAi4vssr/dR789L2+dXVQmk1JPIhPZN2nFL5mp2ML7hg BUSPg6BHnf6w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,396,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="281283658" Received: from otc-nc-03.jf.intel.com (HELO otc-nc-03) ([10.54.39.25]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2020 10:19:49 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:19:49 -0700 From: "Raj, Ashok" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, bhelgaas@google.com, will@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Ashok Raj Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PCI, iommu: Factor 'untrusted' check for ATS enablement Message-ID: <20200515171948.GC75440@otc-nc-03> References: <20200515104359.1178606-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200515154351.GA6546@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200515154351.GA6546@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:43:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you please lift the untrusted flag into struct device? It really > isn't a PCI specific concept, and we should not have code poking into > pci_dev all over the iommu code. Just for clarification: All IOMMU's today mostly pertain to only PCI devices and for devices that aren't PCI like HPET for instance we give a PCI identifier. Facilities like ATS for instance require the platform to have an IOMMU. what additional problems does moving this to struct device solve? Cheers, Ashok