From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14F1C433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B419620825 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:13:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591773215; bh=9/XwdMFddmKG/Fg7fia56TYy7QMv+4JQHM/sDjaOilE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=gt9SumIC+EswPp/ko7+XLKfV7HF/kn1oTZC3Z9RZRrkoltzZfWf64+7OwomkU7lyh pPMCoekg3dPcTCgV0UY5J46fdEdWU3GnHo40JDEqXYsVJtlTD81mEKBEopR5O6dCQi 3ishtnCCmci+fCDK8Y+8NzK2xFxRmFTJko5XblsM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726298AbgFJHNf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:13:35 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52580 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726274AbgFJHNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:13:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D76C62081A; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:13:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591773213; bh=9/XwdMFddmKG/Fg7fia56TYy7QMv+4JQHM/sDjaOilE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rf0RY8JQZEHZC+ruF/Fmpwo8bggVSbfuKiBGRBd9upWHm1PNCm/oveJSLSO/MD1u4 zatapG6vPJVr6SrFN9U4IaU3kBi/U9XqsWNNpqp/vcBczYnY2qrO4t0f75TUjJ/ybr k9cXW6PxpM+jFMNMGX2JjyymnWnbtmdscrI5k1J0= Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:13:31 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Rajat Jain Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Rajat Jain , "Raj, Ashok" , "Krishnakumar, Lalithambika" , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci , Mika Westerberg , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Prashant Malani , Benson Leung , Todd Broch , Alex Levin , Mattias Nissler , Zubin Mithra , Bernie Keany , Aaron Durbin , Diego Rivas , Duncan Laurie , Furquan Shaikh , Jesse Barnes , Christian Kellner , Alex Williamson , Joerg Roedel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict the untrusted devices, to bind to only a set of "whitelisted" drivers Message-ID: <20200610071331.GD1923109@kroah.com> References: <20200607113632.GA49147@kroah.com> <20200609210400.GA1461839@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 04:23:54PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote: > The one thing that still needs more thought is how about the > "pcieport" driver that enumerates the PCI bridges. I'm unsure if it > needs to be whitelisted for further enumeration downstream. What do > you think? Why not just do whatever type of "code review" you need to do for that one core driver to get that off of your "drivers to worry about" list? :) thanks, greg k-h