From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Make pcie_find_root_port() work for PCIe root ports as well
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:14:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701101400.GN5180@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630220107.GA3489322@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:01:07PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 07:12:48PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Commit 6ae72bfa656e ("PCI: Unify pcie_find_root_port() and
> > pci_find_pcie_root_port()") unified the root port finding functionality
> > into a single function but missed the fact that the passed in device may
> > already be a root port. This causes the kernel to block power management
> > of PCIe hierarchies in recent systems because ->bridge_d3 started to
> > return false for such ports after the commit in question.
> >
> > Fixes: 6ae72bfa656e ("PCI: Unify pcie_find_root_port() and pci_find_pcie_root_port()")
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > include/linux/pci.h | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index c79d83304e52..c17c24f5eeed 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -2169,8 +2169,13 @@ static inline int pci_pcie_type(const struct pci_dev *dev)
> > */
> > static inline struct pci_dev *pcie_find_root_port(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > - struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> > + struct pci_dev *bridge;
> >
> > + /* If dev is already root port */
> > + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > + return dev;
> > +
> > + bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> > while (bridge) {
> > if (pci_pcie_type(bridge) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > return bridge;
>
> I applied the patch below, which is slightly simplified but I think
> still equivalent, to for-linus for v5.8. Let me know if it's not.
Thanks I just tested and it also works fine.
> I dropped the stable tag because 6ae72bfa656e was merged for v5.8-rc1,
> and I assume v5.7 works correctly so it doesn't need any change.
Right, makes sense.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-01 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 16:12 [PATCH] PCI: Make pcie_find_root_port() work for PCIe root ports as well Mika Westerberg
2020-06-30 22:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-01 1:53 ` Yicong Yang
2020-07-01 10:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-07-01 12:47 ` Yicong Yang
2020-07-01 10:14 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200701101400.GN5180@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox