From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F0C433E4 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FD82080D for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:23:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595546588; bh=LpBa7WC+PmUuvju8pxnLc0G1tsZpO642XLjDjk2e2t4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=EST5qrYewreeoHr+LNo4cputfs8LxCVnWu8aA2JFLSTrQlkZ0Y6Vv6xHbCSw8TE14 xRNeqC+wK6sc5j54wHAKqJqIwKWh5t1Jilu1HEwKIEfMvxvkZ/UKZyGoJ5Er2rsC32 2e/sSJI0fv/Il3Vs2hMrFIC79T55sP4xOrRe7dHs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726856AbgGWXXE (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:23:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35016 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726723AbgGWXXE (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:23:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (mobile-166-175-191-139.mycingular.net [166.175.191.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11DDF2080D; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:23:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1595546583; bh=LpBa7WC+PmUuvju8pxnLc0G1tsZpO642XLjDjk2e2t4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=X6o9ceMGv+6QFquvn2TvPUVx/zu/mVWGEEU5pf4oh4Wgllo8B2E5tlVVO7LTPHkUY vz0BD9uuKTVDQ5v9CUpFPDMx+YAboz9sTAgKqWl9xkpr6EbsU/q4IJqYAvqDYb1TQX CRixz1EWv7+K81kyoOJtGumwMEuGHYTp0h0tF/YU= Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:23:01 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Shiju Jose Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, bp@alien8.de, james.morse@arm.com, lenb@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, jroedel@suse.de, linuxarm@huawei.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, tanxiaofei@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor specific HW errors Message-ID: <20200723232301.GA1468407@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200722104245.1060-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Shiju Jose wrote: > CPER records describing a firmware-first error are identified by GUID. > The ghes driver currently logs, but ignores any unknown CPER records. > This prevents describing errors that can't be represented by a standard > entry, that would otherwise allow a driver to recover from an error. > The UEFI spec calls these 'Non-standard Section Body' (N.2.3 of > version 2.8). > > patch set > 1. add a notifier chain for these non-standard/vendor-records > in the ghes driver. > > 2. add a driver to handle HiSilicon HIP PCIe controller's errors. > > Changes: > > V13: > 1. Following changes in the HIP PCIe error handling driver. > 1.1 Add Bjorn's acked-by. > 1.2. Address the comments and macros order Bjorn mentioned. > Fix the words in the commit. This series is ill-formed: - Jul 22 5:39 Shiju Jose [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not - Jul 22 5:39 Shiju Jose └─>[PATCH v13 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier - Jul 22 5:42 Shiju Jose [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to not - Jul 22 5:42 Shiju Jose └─>[PATCH v13 2/2] PCI: hip: Add handling of Hi Patches 1/2 and 2/2 never appear in the same thread. Both should be replies to 0/2. And should be only *one* v13 0/2, not two :) Bjorn