Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>, helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	"Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] PCI/ASPM: Compute the value of aspm_register_info.support directly
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:22:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202009251239.3nvnBGSf%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924142443.260861-4-refactormyself@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7441 bytes --]

Hi "Saheed,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on pci/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.9-rc6 next-20200924]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Saheed-O-Bolarinwa/PCI-ASPM-Cache-device-s-ASPM-link-capability-in-struct-pci_dev/20200924-232457
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-a005-20200923 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c32e69b2ce7abfb151a87ba363ac9e25abf7d417)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9cce0413425d28cbbb50a18bc01174c0f126632e
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Saheed-O-Bolarinwa/PCI-ASPM-Cache-device-s-ASPM-link-capability-in-struct-pci_dev/20200924-232457
        git checkout 9cce0413425d28cbbb50a18bc01174c0f126632e
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=x86_64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:542:2: error: void function 'aspm_support' should not return a value [-Wreturn-type]
           return (pdev->lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPMS) >> 10;
           ^      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:566:29: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('void' and 'void')
           if (!(aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child)))
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:586:27: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('void' and 'void')
           if (aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child) & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:597:27: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('void' and 'void')
           if (aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child) & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1)
               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   4 errors generated.

vim +/aspm_support +542 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c

   539	
   540	static void aspm_support(struct pci_dev *pdev)
   541	{
 > 542		return (pdev->lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPMS) >> 10;
   543	}
   544	
   545	static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
   546	{
   547		struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
   548		struct pci_bus *linkbus = parent->subordinate;
   549		struct aspm_register_info upreg, dwreg;
   550	
   551		if (blacklist) {
   552			/* Set enabled/disable so that we will disable ASPM later */
   553			link->aspm_enabled = ASPM_STATE_ALL;
   554			link->aspm_disable = ASPM_STATE_ALL;
   555			return;
   556		}
   557	
   558		/* Get upstream/downstream components' register state */
   559		pcie_get_aspm_reg(parent, &upreg);
   560		pcie_get_aspm_reg(child, &dwreg);
   561	
   562		/*
   563		 * If ASPM not supported, don't mess with the clocks and link,
   564		 * bail out now.
   565		 */
 > 566		if (!(aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child)))
   567			return;
   568	
   569		/* Configure common clock before checking latencies */
   570		pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(link);
   571	
   572		/*
   573		 * Re-read upstream/downstream components' register state
   574		 * after clock configuration
   575		 */
   576		pcie_get_aspm_reg(parent, &upreg);
   577		pcie_get_aspm_reg(child, &dwreg);
   578	
   579		/*
   580		 * Setup L0s state
   581		 *
   582		 * Note that we must not enable L0s in either direction on a
   583		 * given link unless components on both sides of the link each
   584		 * support L0s.
   585		 */
   586		if (aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child) & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
   587			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L0S;
   588	
   589		if (dwreg.enabled & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
   590			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
   591		if (upreg.enabled & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
   592			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
   593		link->latency_up.l0s = calc_l0s_latency(parent);
   594		link->latency_dw.l0s = calc_l0s_latency(child);
   595	
   596		/* Setup L1 state */
   597		if (aspm_support(parent) & aspm_support(child) & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1)
   598			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1;
   599	
   600		if (upreg.enabled & dwreg.enabled & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1)
   601			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1;
   602		link->latency_up.l1 = calc_l1_latency(parent);
   603		link->latency_dw.l1 = calc_l1_latency(child);
   604	
   605		/* Setup L1 substate */
   606		if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_1)
   607			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1;
   608		if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_ASPM_L1_2)
   609			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2;
   610		if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_1)
   611			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM;
   612		if (upreg.l1ss_cap & dwreg.l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_PCIPM_L1_2)
   613			link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM;
   614	
   615		if (upreg.l1ss_ctl1 & dwreg.l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_ASPM_L1_1)
   616			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1;
   617		if (upreg.l1ss_ctl1 & dwreg.l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_ASPM_L1_2)
   618			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2;
   619		if (upreg.l1ss_ctl1 & dwreg.l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_PCIPM_L1_1)
   620			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1_1_PCIPM;
   621		if (upreg.l1ss_ctl1 & dwreg.l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_PCIPM_L1_2)
   622			link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM;
   623	
   624		if (link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1SS)
   625			aspm_calc_l1ss_info(link, &upreg, &dwreg);
   626	
   627		/* Save default state */
   628		link->aspm_default = link->aspm_enabled;
   629	
   630		/* Setup initial capable state. Will be updated later */
   631		link->aspm_capable = link->aspm_support;
   632	
   633		/* Get and check endpoint acceptable latencies */
   634		list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
   635			u32 reg32, encoding;
   636			struct aspm_latency *acceptable =
   637				&link->acceptable[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)];
   638	
   639			if (pci_pcie_type(child) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT &&
   640			    pci_pcie_type(child) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_LEG_END)
   641				continue;
   642	
   643			pcie_capability_read_dword(child, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &reg32);
   644			/* Calculate endpoint L0s acceptable latency */
   645			encoding = (reg32 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_L0S) >> 6;
   646			acceptable->l0s = calc_l0s_acceptable(encoding);
   647			/* Calculate endpoint L1 acceptable latency */
   648			encoding = (reg32 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_L1) >> 9;
   649			acceptable->l1 = calc_l1_acceptable(encoding);
   650	
   651			pcie_aspm_check_latency(child);
   652		}
   653	}
   654	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 36645 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24 14:24 [PATCH v2 0/7] PCI/ASPM: Move some ASPM info to struct pci_dev Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] PCI/ASPM: Cache device's ASPM link capability in " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 22:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 22:32   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 22:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] PCI/ASPM: Rework calc_l*_latency() to take a " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] PCI/ASPM: Compute the value of aspm_register_info.support directly Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 22:36   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-25  4:22   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] PCI/ASPM: Replace aspm_register_info.l1ss_cap* Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 22:45   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] PCI/ASPM: Remove aspm_register_info.l1ss_ctl* Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_register_info and pcie_get_aspm_reg() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-09-24 22:51   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.l1ss Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202009251239.3nvnBGSf%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox