linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@amazon.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH dwc-next 1/3] PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:57:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005165733.1dc15ce0@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian>

Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may
work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation
in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those
drivers.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c |  8 +++-----
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c    | 14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
index ad7da4ea43a5..411b7624331d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -432,10 +432,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_stop(struct pci_epc *epc)
 	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
 
-	if (!pci->ops->stop_link)
-		return;
-
-	pci->ops->stop_link(pci);
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->stop_link)
+		pci->ops->stop_link(pci);
 }
 
 static int dw_pcie_ep_start(struct pci_epc *epc)
@@ -443,7 +441,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_start(struct pci_epc *epc)
 	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
 
-	if (!pci->ops->start_link)
+	if (!pci->ops || !pci->ops->start_link)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return pci->ops->start_link(pci);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
index 3c1f17c78241..2a6109109029 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ u32 dw_pcie_read_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, size_t size)
 	int ret;
 	u32 val;
 
-	if (pci->ops->read_dbi)
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->read_dbi)
 		return pci->ops->read_dbi(pci, pci->dbi_base, reg, size);
 
 	ret = dw_pcie_read(pci->dbi_base + reg, size, &val);
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void dw_pcie_write_dbi(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, size_t size, u32 val)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (pci->ops->write_dbi) {
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->write_dbi) {
 		pci->ops->write_dbi(pci, pci->dbi_base, reg, size, val);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ void dw_pcie_write_dbi2(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, size_t size, u32 val)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (pci->ops->write_dbi2) {
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->write_dbi2) {
 		pci->ops->write_dbi2(pci, pci->dbi_base2, reg, size, val);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static u32 dw_pcie_readl_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg)
 	int ret;
 	u32 val;
 
-	if (pci->ops->read_dbi)
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->read_dbi)
 		return pci->ops->read_dbi(pci, pci->atu_base, reg, 4);
 
 	ret = dw_pcie_read(pci->atu_base + reg, 4, &val);
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 reg, u32 val)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (pci->ops->write_dbi) {
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->write_dbi) {
 		pci->ops->write_dbi(pci, pci->atu_base, reg, 4, val);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
 {
 	u32 retries, val;
 
-	if (pci->ops->cpu_addr_fixup)
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->cpu_addr_fixup)
 		cpu_addr = pci->ops->cpu_addr_fixup(pci, cpu_addr);
 
 	if (pci->iatu_unroll_enabled) {
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ int dw_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 {
 	u32 val;
 
-	if (pci->ops->link_up)
+	if (pci->ops && pci->ops->link_up)
 		return pci->ops->link_up(pci);
 
 	val = readl(pci->dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_DEBUG1);
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-05  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-05  8:56 [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05  8:57 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2020-10-05  8:57 ` [PATCH dwc-next 2/3] PCI: dwc: al: Remove " Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05  9:03 ` [PATCH dwc-next 3/3] PCI: dwc: imx6: " Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201005165733.1dc15ce0@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonnyc@amazon.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).