From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Utkarsh Patel <utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Do not generate wakeup event when runtime resuming bus
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:37:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201113063745.GH2495@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029092453.69869-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:24:53PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When a PCI bridge is runtime resumed from D3cold the underlying bus is
> walked and the attached devices are runtime resumed as well. However, in
> addition to that we also generate a wakeup event for these devices even
> though this actually is not a real wakeup event coming from the
> hardware.
>
> Normally this does not cause problems but when combined with
> /sys/power/wakeup_count like using the steps below:
>
> # count=$(cat /sys/power/wakeup_count)
> # echo $count > /sys/power/wakeup_count
> # echo mem > /sys/power/state
>
> The system suspend cycle might get aborted at this point if a PCI bridge
> that was runtime suspended (D3cold) was runtime resumed for any reason.
> The runtime resume calls pci_wakeup_bus() and that generates wakeup
> event increasing wakeup_count.
>
> Since this is not a real wakeup event we can prevent the above from
> happening by removing the call to pci_wakeup_event() in
> pci_wakeup_bus(). While there rename pci_wakeup_bus() to
> pci_resume_bus() to better reflect what it does.
Any comments on this?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 9:24 [PATCH] PCI/PM: Do not generate wakeup event when runtime resuming bus Mika Westerberg
2020-11-13 6:37 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2020-11-16 16:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-16 16:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-18 21:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-19 7:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2020-11-20 2:27 ` Patel, Utkarsh H
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201113063745.GH2495@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=utkarsh.h.patel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox