From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com,
knsathya@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set.
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:12:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125201215.GA673882@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc87c9e675118960949043a832bed86bc22becbd.1603766889.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:57:05PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
> of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
> User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
> result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
> pcie_ports_native is unset.
>
> Also, since struct pci_host_bridge ->native_* members caches the
> ownership status of various PCIe capabilities, use them instead
> of distributed checks for pcie_ports_native.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 9 +++-----
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index c12b5fb3e8fb..a9e6b782622d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(struct acpi_device *adev)
> | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT \
> | OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT)
>
> +#define OSC_OWNER(ctrl, bit, flag) \
> + do { \
> + if (!(ctrl & bit)) \
> + flag = 0; \
> + } while (0)
> +
> static const struct acpi_device_id root_device_ids[] = {
> {"PNP0A03", 0},
> {"", 0},
> @@ -887,6 +893,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> struct pci_bus *bus;
> struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> union acpi_object *obj;
> + u32 ctrl;
>
> info->root = root;
> info->bridge = device;
> @@ -912,18 +919,26 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> goto out_release_info;
>
> host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> - host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
> +
> + if (pcie_ports_native) {
> + decode_osc_control(root, "OS forcibly taking over",
> + OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CONTROL_MASKS);
The only place OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CONTROL_MASKS is used is right here, so
it's kind of pointless.
I think I'd rather have this:
dev_info(&root->device->dev, "Ignoring PCIe-related _OSC results because \"pcie_ports=native\" specified\n");
> + } else {
> + ctrl = root->osc_control_set;
> + OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL,
> + host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug);
> + OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL,
> + host_bridge->native_aer);
> + OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL,
> + host_bridge->native_pme);
> + OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL,
> + host_bridge->native_ltr);
> + OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL,
> + host_bridge->native_dpc);
> + }
> +
> if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
> - host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
> - host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
> - host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
> - host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
followed by something like this after we're done fiddling with all the
host_bridge->native* bits:
#define FLAG(x) ((x) ? '+' : '-')
dev_info(&root->device->dev, "OS native features: SHPCHotplug%c PCIeCapability%c PCIeHotplug%c PME%c AER%c DPC%c LTR%c\n",
FLAG(host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug),
?,
FLAG(host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug),
...);
But I don't know how to handle OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
since we don't track it the same way. Maybe we'd have to omit it from
this message for now?
> /*
> * Evaluate the "PCI Boot Configuration" _DSM Function. If it
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> index ad3393930ecb..d1831e6bf60a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static bool pme_is_native(struct pcie_device *dev)
> const struct pci_host_bridge *host;
>
> host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->port->bus);
> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme;
> + return host->native_pme;
> }
>
> static void pciehp_disable_interrupt(struct pcie_device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index bf03648c2072..a84f75ec6df8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -800,9 +800,6 @@ bool pciehp_is_native(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> if (!(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC))
> return false;
>
> - if (pcie_ports_native)
> - return true;
> -
> host = pci_find_host_bridge(bridge->bus);
> return host->native_pcie_hotplug;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 65dff5f3457a..79bb441139c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (!dev->aer_cap)
> return 0;
>
> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer;
> + return host->native_aer;
> }
>
> int pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index 50a9522ab07d..ccd5e0ce5605 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
> int services = 0;
>
> - if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)) {
> + if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge && host->native_pcie_hotplug) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>
> /*
> @@ -221,8 +220,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
> - if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)) {
> + if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() && host->native_aer) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
>
> /*
> @@ -238,8 +236,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
> * Event Collectors can also generate PMEs, but we don't handle
> * those yet.
> */
> - if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT && host->native_pme) {
> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 39263c6b52e1..35689f4e8e1f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ extern bool osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed;
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL 0x00000020
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL 0x00000080
> #define OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS 0x000000bf
> +/* Masks specific to PCIe Capabilities */
> +#define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CONTROL_MASKS 0x000000bd
>
> #define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_QUICK 0x00000002
> #define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_SEND_RCV 0x00000004
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 2:57 [PATCH v11 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership detection logic Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-27 2:57 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] PCI: Conditionally initialize host bridge native_* members Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-28 6:09 ` Ethan Zhao
2020-10-28 17:14 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-27 2:57 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-25 20:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-11-25 22:21 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-25 22:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-25 22:38 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-25 20:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-26 0:58 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-27 2:57 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC DPC negotiation result if pcie_ports_dpc_native " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-25 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-10-27 2:57 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] PCI/portdrv: Remove redundant pci_aer_available() check in DPC enable logic Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-10-28 6:00 ` Ethan Zhao
2020-10-28 17:13 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-02 9:59 ` Ethan Zhao
2020-10-27 2:57 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] PCI/DPC: Move AER/DPC dependency checks out of DPC driver Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2020-11-13 21:59 ` [PATCH v11 0/5] Simplify PCIe native ownership detection logic Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201125201215.GA673882@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).