From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92139C433DB for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C41D23158 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727220AbhAFWkp (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:40:45 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:53694 "EHLO hera.aquilenet.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726973AbhAFWko (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:40:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5946BB; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:40:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vnVwzdxEFMXf; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:40:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from function.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr (lfbn-bor-1-56-204.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.50.148.204]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9FB643F; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:40:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from samy by function.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kxHTE-006P4i-FV; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 23:40:00 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 23:40:00 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Keith Busch Cc: Vidya Sagar , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Are AER corrected errors worrying? Message-ID: <20210106224000.skryo2aijhfiomfw@function> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Keith Busch , Vidya Sagar , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org References: <20210101224028.4akud7meibjavvtf@function> <20210104184435.GE1024941@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> <20210104201247.5k47gueib3cw4sfr@function> <20210104213648.enkuq5e2o6adbiur@function> <20210106202823.ehdkno3inlzszqtb@function> <20210106214808.GA1280721@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210106214808.GA1280721@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> Organization: I am not organized User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Keith Busch, le mer. 06 janv. 2021 13:48:08 -0800, a ecrit: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:28:23PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Is there more I can provide to investigate if that can somehow be fixed > > in the driver? I guess I can safely use the system with pcie_aspm=off? > > (the energy saving seems neglectible) > > I don't think there's more to do from the kernel or driver beyond > disabling usage of the problematic feature. I think a proper fix would > have to come from the hardware vendor. Ok, thanks! Samuel