From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI/sysfs: Move to kstrtobool() to handle user input
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:38:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914203829.GA1454594@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706010622.3058968-1-kw@linux.com>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 01:06:19AM +0000, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
> A common use case for many PCI sysfs objects is to either enable some
> functionality or trigger an action following a write to a given
> attribute where the value is written would be simply either "1" or "0"
> synonymous with either disabling or enabling something.
>
> Parsing and validation of the input values are currently done using the
> kstrtoul() function to convert anything in the string buffer into an
> integer value - anything non-zero would be accepted as "enable" and zero
> simply as "disable".
>
> For a while now, the kernel offers another function called kstrtobool()
> which was created to parse common user inputs into a boolean value, so
> that a range of values such as "y", "n", "1", "0", "on" and "off"
> handled in a case-insensitive manner would yield a boolean true or false
> result accordingly after the input string has been parsed.
>
> Thus, move to kstrtobool() over kstrtoul() as it's a better fit for
> parsing user input, and it also implicitly offers a range check as only
> a finite amount of possible input values will be considered as valid.
If I understand correctly, a user could enable things by writing "5"
today, and if we switch to kstrbool(), that will no longer work.
I'm sure everything is *documented* such that one should write "1" or
other sensible values. But I'm not sure there's benefit in adding new
restrictions.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-14 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 1:06 [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI/sysfs: Move to kstrtobool() to handle user input Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-07-06 1:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI/sysfs: Check CAP_SYS_ADMIN before parsing " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-07-06 1:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI/sysfs: Return -EINVAL consistently from "store" functions Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-07-06 1:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Don't use the strtobool() wrapper for kstrtobool() Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-09-14 20:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-09-15 1:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI/sysfs: Move to kstrtobool() to handle user input Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210914203829.GA1454594@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox