linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kw@linux.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.parent
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:52:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210916085206.2268-2-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916085206.2268-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>

From: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>

Information cached in struct pcie_link_state.parent is accessible
via struct pci_dev.

This patch:
 - removes *parent* from the *struct pcie_link_state*
 - adjusts all references to it to access the information directly

Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa O. Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
OPINION: the checkpatch.pl scring warns on this line:
	`BUG_ON(root->pdev->bus->parent->self);`
however, I think if a root device reports a parent, that is serious!

 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 013a47f587ce..48b83048aa30 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;		/* Upstream component of the Link */
 	struct pci_dev *downstream;	/* Downstream component, function 0 */
 	struct pcie_link_state *root;	/* pointer to the root port link */
-	struct pcie_link_state *parent;	/* pointer to the parent Link state */
 	struct list_head sibling;	/* node in link_list */
 
 	/* ASPM state */
@@ -379,6 +378,7 @@ static void encode_l12_threshold(u32 threshold_us, u32 *scale, u32 *value)
 static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
 {
 	u32 latency, l1_switch_latency = 0;
+	struct pci_dev *parent;
 	struct aspm_latency *acceptable;
 	struct pcie_link_state *link;
 
@@ -419,7 +419,8 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
 			link->aspm_capable &= ~ASPM_STATE_L1;
 		l1_switch_latency += 1000;
 
-		link = link->parent;
+		parent = link->pdev->bus->parent->self;
+		link = !parent ? NULL : parent->link_state;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -793,9 +794,11 @@ static void pcie_config_aspm_link(struct pcie_link_state *link, u32 state)
 
 static void pcie_config_aspm_path(struct pcie_link_state *link)
 {
+	struct pci_dev *parent;
 	while (link) {
 		pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
-		link = link->parent;
+		parent = link->pdev->bus->parent->self;
+		link = !parent ? NULL : parent->link_state;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -872,8 +875,7 @@ static struct pcie_link_state *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 			return NULL;
 		}
 
-		link->parent = parent;
-		link->root = link->parent->root;
+		link->root = parent->root;
 	}
 
 	list_add(&link->sibling, &link_list);
@@ -962,7 +964,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 static void pcie_update_aspm_capable(struct pcie_link_state *root)
 {
 	struct pcie_link_state *link;
-	BUG_ON(root->parent);
+	BUG_ON(root->pdev->bus->parent->self);
 	list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
 		if (link->root != root)
 			continue;
@@ -985,6 +987,7 @@ static void pcie_update_aspm_capable(struct pcie_link_state *root)
 /* @pdev: the endpoint device */
 void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
+	struct pci_dev *parent_dev;
 	struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self;
 	struct pcie_link_state *link, *root, *parent_link;
 
@@ -1002,7 +1005,8 @@ void pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 
 	link = parent->link_state;
 	root = link->root;
-	parent_link = link->parent;
+	parent_dev = link->pdev->bus->parent->self;
+	parent_link = !parent_dev ? NULL : parent_dev->link_state;
 
 	/* All functions are removed, so just disable ASPM for the link */
 	pcie_config_aspm_link(link, 0);
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16  8:52 [RFC PATCH 0/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove unncessary linked list in aspm.c Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-16  8:52 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2021-09-26 22:05   ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.parent Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-16  8:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.root Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-16  8:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.downstream Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-16  8:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove unncessary linked list defined within aspm.c Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210916085206.2268-2-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).