linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_disable
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:20:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210930202000.GA906085@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929004400.25717-5-refactormyself@gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:44:00AM +0200, Saheed O. Bolarinwa wrote:
> From: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
> 
> The clkpm_disable member of the struct pcie_link_state indicates
> if the Clock PM state of the device is disabled. There are two
> situations which can cause the Clock PM state disabled.
> 1. If the device fails sanity check as in pcie_aspm_sanity_check()
> 2. By calling __pci_disable_link_state()

And, 3. clkpm_store(), when the user writes to the "clkpm" sysfs file,
right?

IIUC, clkpm_disable really tells us whether we can enable clkpm.  The
only place we test clkpm_disable is in pcie_set_clkpm():

  pcie_set_clkpm(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
  {
    if (!link->clkpm_capable || link->clkpm_disable)
      enable = 0;
    pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck(link, enable);
  }

So in other words, if clkpm_disable is set, we will never call
pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck() to *enable* clkpm.  We will only call it to
*disable* clkpm.

Tangent: I think the usefulness of pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck() being a
separate function is gone.  I think things will be a little simpler if
we integrate it into pcie_set_clkpm().  Separate preliminary patch, of
course.

> It is possible to set the Clock PM state of a device ON or OFF by
> calling pcie_set_clkpm(). The state can be retieved by calling
> pcie_get_clkpm_state().

s/retieved/retrieved/

> pcie_link_state.clkpm_disable is only accessed in pcie_set_clkpm()
> to ensure that Clock PM state can be reenabled after being disabled.
> 
> This patch:
>   - add pm_disable to the struct pcie_link_state, to indicate that
>     the kernel has marked the device's AS and Clock PM states disabled
>   - removes clkpm_disable from the struct pcie_link_state
>   - removes all instance where clkpm_disable is set
>   - ensure that the Clock PM is always disabled if it is part of the
>     states passed into __pci_disable_link_state(), regardless of the
>     global policy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa O. Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 18 +++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 368828cd427d..e6ae00daa7ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
>  	u32 aspm_default:7;		/* Default ASPM state by BIOS */
>  	u32 aspm_disable:7;		/* Disabled ASPM state */
>  
> -	/* Clock PM state */
> -	u32 clkpm_disable:1;		/* Clock PM disabled */
> +	u32 pm_disabled:1;		/* Disabled AS and Clock PM ? */

What did we gain by renaming this?  AFAICT this only affects clkpm
(the only test of pm_disabled is in pcie_set_clkpm()).

>  	/* Exit latencies */
>  	struct aspm_latency latency_up;	/* Upstream direction exit latency */
> @@ -198,7 +197,7 @@ static void pcie_set_clkpm(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
>  	 * Don't enable Clock PM if the link is not Clock PM capable
>  	 * or Clock PM is disabled
>  	 */
> -	if (!capable || link->clkpm_disable)
> +	if (enable && (!capable || link->pm_disabled))
>  		enable = 0;
>  	/* Need nothing if the specified equals to current state */
>  	if (pcie_get_clkpm_state(link->pdev) == enable)
> @@ -206,11 +205,6 @@ static void pcie_set_clkpm(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
>  	pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck(link, enable);
>  }
>  
> -static void pcie_clkpm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
> -{
> -	link->clkpm_disable = blacklist ? 1 : 0;
> -}
> -
>  static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
> @@ -952,8 +946,7 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	 */
>  	pcie_aspm_cap_init(link, blacklist);
>  
> -	/* Setup initial Clock PM state */
> -	pcie_clkpm_cap_init(link, blacklist);
> +	link->pm_disabled = blacklist;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * At this stage drivers haven't had an opportunity to change the
> @@ -1129,8 +1122,8 @@ static int __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem)
>  	pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
>  
>  	if (state & PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM)
> -		link->clkpm_disable = 1;
> -	pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link));
> +		pcie_set_clkpm(link, 0);
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock);
>  	if (sem)
>  		up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> @@ -1301,7 +1294,6 @@ static ssize_t clkpm_store(struct device *dev,
>  	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  	mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
>  
> -	link->clkpm_disable = !state_enable;

Something is seriously wrong here because clkpm_store() no longer does
anything with "state_enable", the value we got from the user.

>  	pcie_set_clkpm(link, policy_to_clkpm_state(link));
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  0:43 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_* Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-29  0:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] [PCI/ASPM:] Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_default Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-30 15:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-11  6:05     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2021-09-29  0:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_capable Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-30 16:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29  0:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_enabled Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-30 16:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29  0:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.clkpm_disable Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-09-30 20:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-10-11  6:06     ` Saheed Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210930202000.GA906085@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).