From: <kelvin.cao@microchip.com>
To: <kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com>, <logang@deltatee.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kelvin.cao@microchip.com>, <kelvincao@outlook.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI/switchtec: Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:18:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014141859.11444-5-kelvin.cao@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211014141859.11444-1-kelvin.cao@microchip.com>
From: Kelvin Cao <kelvin.cao@microchip.com>
ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, and the following checkpatch.pl
warning will be given for new patches which still use ENOTSUPP.
WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
See the link below for the discussion.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200511165319.2251678-1-kuba@kernel.org/
Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP to align with future patches which will
be using EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Kelvin Cao <kelvin.cao@microchip.com>
---
drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
index 97a93c9b4629..236cb40cc7c5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static ssize_t field ## _show(struct device *dev, \
return io_string_show(buf, &si->gen4.field, \
sizeof(si->gen4.field)); \
else \
- return -ENOTSUPP; \
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; \
} \
\
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(field)
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ static int ioctl_flash_info(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
info.flash_length = ioread32(&fi->gen4.flash_length);
info.num_partitions = SWITCHTEC_NUM_PARTITIONS_GEN4;
} else {
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (copy_to_user(uinfo, &info, sizeof(info)))
@@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static int ioctl_flash_part_info(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
if (ret)
return ret;
} else {
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
if (copy_to_user(uinfo, &info, sizeof(info)))
@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ static int switchtec_init_pci(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
else if (stdev->gen == SWITCHTEC_GEN4)
part_id = &stdev->mmio_sys_info->gen4.partition_id;
else
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
stdev->partition = ioread8(part_id);
stdev->partition_count = ioread8(&stdev->mmio_ntb->partition_count);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 14:18 [PATCH v2 0/5] Switchtec Fixes and Improvements kelvin.cao
2021-10-14 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI/switchtec: Error out MRPC execution when MMIO reads fail kelvin.cao
2021-10-15 1:21 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-10-15 22:13 ` Kelvin.Cao
2021-10-14 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI/switchtec: Fix a MRPC error status handling issue kelvin.cao
2021-10-14 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] PCI/switchtec: Update the way of getting management VEP instance ID kelvin.cao
2021-10-14 14:18 ` kelvin.cao [this message]
2021-10-15 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI/switchtec: Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-10-14 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI/switchtec: Add check of event support kelvin.cao
2021-10-14 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Switchtec Fixes and Improvements Bjorn Helgaas
2021-10-14 21:19 ` Kelvin.Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211014141859.11444-5-kelvin.cao@microchip.com \
--to=kelvin.cao@microchip.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kelvincao@outlook.com \
--cc=kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).