public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 0/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency
Date: Sat,  6 Nov 2021 18:53:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211106175305.25565-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)

From: "Bolarinwa O. Saheed" <refactormyself@gmail.com>

To validate and set link latency capability, `struct aspm_latency` and
related members defined within `struct pcie_link_state` are used.
However, since there are not many access to theses values, it is
possible to directly access and compute these values.

Doing this will also reduce the dependency on `struct pcie_link_state`.

The series removes `struct aspm_latency` and related members within
`struct pcie_link_state`. All latencies are now calculated when needed.


VERSION CHANGES:
- v2:
»       - directly access downstream by calling `pci_function_0()`
»         instead of using the `struct pcie_link_state`

- v3:
»       - rebase on Linux 5.15-rc2

- v4 (this version)
	- Create a seprate path to move pci_function_0() upward

MERGE NOTICE:
These series are based on
»       'commit e4e737bb5c17 ("Linux 5.15-rc2")'

Saheed O. Bolarinwa (4):
  PCI/ASPM: Move pci_function_0() upward
  PCI/ASPM: Do not cache link latencies
  PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.acceptable
  PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency

 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-06 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-06 17:53 Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/4] PCI/ASPM: Move pci_function_0() upward Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-15  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] PCI/ASPM: Do not cache link latencies Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-15  7:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct pcie_link_state.acceptable Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-15  7:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Remove struct aspm_latency Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-15  7:02   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211106175305.25565-1-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox