public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 4/6] PCI/ASPM: Don't cache struct pcie_link_state->aspm_support
Date: Sat,  6 Nov 2021 18:53:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211106175353.26248-5-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211106175353.26248-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>

aspm_support in struct pcie_link_state is used to cache the
initial supported ASPM capabilty states as calculated within
aspm_calc_init_linkcap(). This value can be accessed directly
by calling aspm_calc_init_linkcap().

- Remove aspm_support from struct pcie_link_state;
- Create a wrapper function for aspm_calc_init_linkcap()
- Call the wrapper function outside pcie_aspm_cap_init()
- Within pcie_aspm_cap_init() use a local variable to replace
  struct pcie_link_state->aspm_support.

Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 5e8613cb5db6..9aaae476ea31 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct pcie_link_state {
 	struct list_head sibling;	/* node in link_list */
 
 	/* ASPM state */
-	u32 aspm_support:7;		/* Supported ASPM state */
 	u32 aspm_enabled:7;		/* Enabled ASPM state */
 	u32 aspm_capable:7;		/* Capable ASPM state with latency */
 	u32 aspm_default:7;		/* Default ASPM state by BIOS */
@@ -450,7 +449,8 @@ static void pci_clear_and_set_dword(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pos,
 
 /* Calculate L1.2 PM substate timing parameters */
 static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
-				u32 parent_l1ss_cap, u32 child_l1ss_cap)
+				u32 aspm_support, u32 parent_l1ss_cap,
+				u32 child_l1ss_cap)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
 	u32 val1, val2, scale1, scale2;
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
 	u32 pctl1, pctl2, cctl1, cctl2;
 	u32 pl1_2_enables, cl1_2_enables;
 
-	if (!(link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK))
+	if (!(aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK))
 		return;
 
 	/* Choose the greater of the two Port Common_Mode_Restore_Times */
@@ -591,6 +591,20 @@ static u32 aspm_calc_init_linkcap(u32 up_lnkcap, u32 dwn_lnkcap,
 	return link_cap;
 }
 
+static u32 aspm_get_init_cap(struct pcie_link_state *link)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
+	u32 parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap;
+	u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
+
+	pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &parent_lnkcap);
+	pcie_capability_read_dword(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &child_lnkcap);
+	aspm_calc_both_l1ss_caps(link, &parent_l1ss_cap, &child_l1ss_cap);
+
+	return aspm_calc_init_linkcap(parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap,
+				      parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
+}
+
 static u32 aspm_calc_enabled_states(struct pcie_link_state *link,
 				    u32 up_l1ss_cap, u32 dwn_l1ss_cap)
 {
@@ -630,7 +644,7 @@ static u32 aspm_calc_enabled_states(struct pcie_link_state *link,
 static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *child = link->downstream, *parent = link->pdev;
-	u32 parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap;
+	u32 parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap, aspm_support;
 	u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
 	struct pci_bus *linkbus = parent->subordinate;
 
@@ -676,15 +690,14 @@ static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
 	/* Save default state */
 	link->aspm_default = link->aspm_enabled;
 
-	link->aspm_support = aspm_calc_init_linkcap(parent_lnkcap,
-						    child_lnkcap,
-						    parent_l1ss_cap,
-						    child_l1ss_cap);
-	if (link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1SS)
-		aspm_calc_l1ss_info(link, parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
+	aspm_support = aspm_calc_init_linkcap(parent_lnkcap, child_lnkcap,
+					      parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
+	if (aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1SS)
+		aspm_calc_l1ss_info(link, aspm_support, parent_l1ss_cap,
+				    child_l1ss_cap);
 
 	/* Setup initial capable state. Will be updated later */
-	link->aspm_capable = link->aspm_support;
+	link->aspm_capable = aspm_support;
 
 	/* Get and check endpoint acceptable latencies */
 	list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
@@ -994,7 +1007,7 @@ static void pcie_update_aspm_capable(struct pcie_link_state *root)
 	list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
 		if (link->root != root)
 			continue;
-		link->aspm_capable = link->aspm_support;
+		link->aspm_capable = aspm_get_init_cap(link);
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry(link, &link_list, sibling) {
 		struct pci_dev *child;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-06 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-06 17:53 [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] Remove struct pcie_link_state.aspm_* Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] PCI/ASPM: Extract out L1SS_CAP calculations Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] PCI/ASPM: Extract the calculation of link->aspm_support Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] PCI/ASPM: Extract the calculation of link->aspm_enabled Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-06 17:53 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/6] PCI/ASPM: Move pcie_aspm_sanity_check() upwards Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2021-11-06 17:53 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] PCI/ASPM: Don't cache struct pcie_link_state->aspm_enabled Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211106175353.26248-5-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox