From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
john@phrozen.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] PCI: mt7621: remove specific MIPS code from driver
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:41:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211117124120.GA9336@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115070809.15529-1-sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 08:08:04AM +0100, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> MIPS specific code can be removed from driver and put into ralink mt7621
> instead which is a more accurate place to do this. To make this possible
> we need to have access to 'bridge->windows' in 'pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()'
> which has been implemented for ralink mt7621 platform (there is no real
> need to implement this for any other platforms since those ones haven't got
> I/O coherency units). This also allow us to properly enable this driver to
> completely be enabled for COMPILE_TEST. This patchset appoarch:
> - Move windows list splice in 'pci_register_host_bridge()' after function
> 'pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()' is called.
> - Implement 'pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()' for ralink mt7621.
> - Avoid custom MIPs code in pcie-mt7621 driver.
> - Add missing 'MODULE_LICENSE()' to pcie-mt7621 driver to avoid compile test
> module compilation to complain (already sent patch from Yanteng Si that
> I have rewrite commit message and long description a bit.
> - Remove MIPS conditional code from Kconfig.
>
> This patchset also fix some errors reported by Kernel Test Robot about
> implicit mips functions used in driver code and fix errors in driver when
> is compiled as a module [1] (mips:allmodconfig).
>
> There was an ongoing discussion about this here [0] but I preferred to send
> my proposal for better review and understanding:
so what's the plan with this patchset ? Going in as fix, probably via
pci tree ? Or is material for next release ? If the latter can we first
fix the allmodconfig by making the Kconfig symbol bool ?
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-17 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 7:08 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: mt7621: remove specific MIPS code from driver Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-15 7:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI: let 'pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()' access to 'bridge->windows' Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-19 23:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 20:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-12-01 20:56 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-12-01 21:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 20:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 7:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] MIPS: ralink: implement 'pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()' Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-15 7:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI: mt7621: avoid custom MIPS code in driver code Sergio Paracuellos
2021-12-01 18:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 19:25 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-15 7:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: mt7621: Add missing 'MODULE_LICENSE()' definition Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-15 12:44 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-15 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-15 13:51 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-15 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-15 21:50 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-15 21:52 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-15 7:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: mt7621: Kconfig: completely enable driver for 'COMPILE_TEST' Sergio Paracuellos
2021-12-01 20:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-01 20:33 ` Sergio Paracuellos
2021-11-17 12:41 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2021-11-17 12:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] PCI: mt7621: remove specific MIPS code from driver Sergio Paracuellos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211117124120.GA9336@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox