linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:10:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211118141043.GQ2105516@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5901c54b-a6eb-b060-aa52-15de7708d703@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:12:41AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The existing iommu_attach_device() allows only for singleton group. As
> we have added group ownership attribute, we can enforce this interface
> only for kernel domain usage.

Below is what I came up with.
 - Replace the file * with a simple void *

 - Use owner_count == 0 <-> dma_owner == DMA_OWNER to simplify
    the logic and remove levels of indent

 - Add a kernel state DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN

 - Rename the user state to DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER

   It differs from the above because it does extra work to keep the
   group isolated that kernel users do no need to do.
 
 - Rename the kernel state to DMA_OWNER_DMA_API to better reflect
   its purpose. Inspired by Robin's point that alot of this is
   indirectly coupled to the domain pointer.

 - Have iommu_attach_device() atomically swap from DMA_OWNER_DMA_API
   to DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN - replaces the group size check.

When we figure out tegra we can add an WARN_ON to iommu_attach_group()
that dma_owner != DMA_OWNER_NONE || DMA_OWNER_DMA_API

Then the whole thing makes some general sense..

Jason

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 064d0679906afd..4cafe074775e30 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct iommu_group {
 	struct list_head entry;
 	enum iommu_dma_owner dma_owner;
 	refcount_t owner_cnt;
-	struct file *owner_user_file;
+	void *owner_cookie;
 };
 
 struct group_device {
@@ -1937,12 +1937,18 @@ int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 	 * change while we are attaching
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
-	ret = -EINVAL;
-	if (iommu_group_device_count(group) != 1)
+	if (group->dma_owner != DMA_OWNER_DMA_API ||
+	    refcount_read(&group->owner_cnt) != 1) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out_unlock;
+	}
 
 	ret = __iommu_attach_group(domain, group);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_unlock;
 
+	group->dma_owner = DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN;
+	group->owner_cookie = domain;
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
 	iommu_group_put(group);
@@ -2193,14 +2199,11 @@ void iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
-	if (iommu_group_device_count(group) != 1) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		goto out_unlock;
-	}
-
+	WARN_ON(group->dma_owner != DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN ||
+		refcount_read(&group->owner_cnt) != 1 ||
+		group->owner_cookie != domain);
+	group->dma_owner = DMA_OWNER_DMA_API;
 	__iommu_detach_group(domain, group);
-
-out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
 	iommu_group_put(group);
 }
@@ -3292,44 +3295,33 @@ static ssize_t iommu_group_store_type(struct iommu_group *group,
 
 static int __iommu_group_set_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group,
 				       enum iommu_dma_owner owner,
-				       struct file *user_file)
+				       void *owner_cookie)
 {
-	if (group->dma_owner != DMA_OWNER_NONE && group->dma_owner != owner)
-		return -EBUSY;
-
-	if (owner == DMA_OWNER_USER) {
-		if (!user_file)
-			return -EINVAL;
-
-		if (group->owner_user_file && group->owner_user_file != user_file)
-			return -EPERM;
+	if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&group->owner_cnt)) {
+		if (group->dma_owner != owner ||
+		    group->owner_cookie != owner_cookie) {
+			refcount_dec(&group->owner_cnt);
+			return -EBUSY;
+		}
+		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&group->owner_cnt)) {
-		group->dma_owner = owner;
-		refcount_set(&group->owner_cnt, 1);
-
-		if (owner == DMA_OWNER_USER) {
-			/*
-			 * The UNMANAGED domain shouldn't be attached before
-			 * claiming the USER ownership for the first time.
-			 */
-			if (group->domain) {
-				if (group->domain != group->default_domain) {
-					group->dma_owner = DMA_OWNER_NONE;
-					refcount_set(&group->owner_cnt, 0);
-
-					return -EBUSY;
-				}
-
-				__iommu_detach_group(group->domain, group);
-			}
-
-			get_file(user_file);
-			group->owner_user_file = user_file;
+	/*
+	 * We must ensure that any device DMAs issued after this call
+	 * are discarded. DMAs can only reach real memory once someone
+	 * has attached a real domain.
+	 */
+	if (owner == DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER) {
+		if (group->domain) {
+			if (group->domain != group->default_domain)
+				return -EBUSY;
+			__iommu_detach_group(group->domain, group);
 		}
 	}
 
+	group->dma_owner = owner;
+	group->owner_cookie = owner_cookie;
+	refcount_set(&group->owner_cnt, 1);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3339,20 +3331,18 @@ static void __iommu_group_release_dma_owner(struct iommu_group *group,
 	if (WARN_ON(group->dma_owner != owner))
 		return;
 
-	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&group->owner_cnt)) {
-		group->dma_owner = DMA_OWNER_NONE;
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&group->owner_cnt))
+		return;
 
-		if (owner == DMA_OWNER_USER) {
-			fput(group->owner_user_file);
-			group->owner_user_file = NULL;
+	group->dma_owner = DMA_OWNER_NONE;
 
-			/*
-			 * The UNMANAGED domain should be detached before all USER
-			 * owners have been released.
-			 */
-			if (!WARN_ON(group->domain) && group->default_domain)
-				__iommu_attach_group(group->default_domain, group);
-		}
+	/*
+	 * The UNMANAGED domain should be detached before all USER
+	 * owners have been released.
+	 */
+	if (owner == DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER) {
+		if (!WARN_ON(group->domain) && group->default_domain)
+			__iommu_attach_group(group->default_domain, group);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
index d8946f22edd5df..7f50dfa7207e9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
@@ -164,14 +164,21 @@ enum iommu_dev_features {
 
 /**
  * enum iommu_dma_owner - IOMMU DMA ownership
- * @DMA_OWNER_NONE: No DMA ownership
- * @DMA_OWNER_KERNEL: Device DMAs are initiated by a kernel driver
- * @DMA_OWNER_USER: Device DMAs are initiated by a userspace driver
+ * @DMA_OWNER_NONE:
+ *  No DMA ownership
+ * @DMA_OWNER_DMA_API:
+ *  Device DMAs are initiated by a kernel driver through the DMA API
+ * @DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN:
+ *  Device DMAs are initiated by a kernel driver
+ * @DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER:
+ *  Device DMAs are initiated by userspace, kernel ensures that DMAs
+ *  never go to kernel memory.
  */
 enum iommu_dma_owner {
 	DMA_OWNER_NONE,
-	DMA_OWNER_KERNEL,
-	DMA_OWNER_USER,
+	DMA_OWNER_DMA_API,
+	DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN,
+	DMA_OWNER_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_USER,
 };
 
 #define IOMMU_PASID_INVALID	(-1U)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-18 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15  2:05 [PATCH 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  1:57     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 13:46       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-17  5:22         ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-17 13:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18  1:12             ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-18 14:10               ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-11-18  2:39         ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-18 13:33           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-19  5:44             ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-19 11:14               ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 15:06                 ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-19 15:43                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-20 11:16                   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 12:56               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  1:52     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  6:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15 13:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:37       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 18:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:35           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:39             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: pci_stub: Suppress kernel DMA ownership auto-claiming Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:14       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 16:17         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 17:54           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:19             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:44               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:22             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:58               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 21:19                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 22:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  6:05     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 20:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  7:24     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 20:22       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 20:48         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] iommu: Add security context management for assigned devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  7:25     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  9:42     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfio: Use DMA_OWNER_USER to declaim passthrough devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211118141043.GQ2105516@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).