From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329F5C433EF for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235734AbhK0OWz (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:22:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34538 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235610AbhK0OUz (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:20:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47FDC061574 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id o13so25122657wrs.12 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:17:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wfPJG337NiEiGZknamoNSmWy9jdr+ykPSrvVDRBcRhk=; b=R5RdcJGCIMSIyZ1UnkUiDR7CpEO7Gta7R1EHBMKnW8bqul9Aj6f9wLXlF88UXkXKll yCjk1fKBoeFuurSKWYi27Ip8mb+gXZm+dDwaEjELIzwHju99NysyNvKezJr5O2nmOryw lgd0zp6Ccn+L1zNjXfjVeYl92KNK1JPKnv4URK/uypK1FAdQVYoXbE+dI9mAXtA8VDOI EUo/okiS4TIvvE4NUC8I/ngrmMl41dYEai+4wXDBm0id14ou/9pArtNmzuUbfY6RVqec g9zVxuCAKh9P3mUfyQ9lnQu2udZKPradeV/jEDSIHbYhfByD3488eZ1mXyWZOXOuNzrR JMZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=wfPJG337NiEiGZknamoNSmWy9jdr+ykPSrvVDRBcRhk=; b=x6X7Xsm2zWMxeizsYKLx1aHXYs/2CzrHNBXUBteQiGAF3hkfRZqdHU0128dzbrNYLm uxnOzTrDqqxro7aWNC5XI1vWCy1adX5jXWX1zBfQnjWMBUXGqPKBz51QEal2JkZNjQc+ CMtepOIfr7+I1biTUsm1ha6LaJD20QKkpsjtFjtkEGXmFrvSCJcLiDnjIXdCmE20F5PA RtJtegv02v5Lul6K8qjFzr1BMBSfY4Gnm8uJAYxrCK8JDXkWuIE+C25qV1cUF4UO8wBJ mgZylSubAT3tAeEhR5FJG0lDlKzy8JvFLG6KqFDuYHFWxFByhgk8EiPYGfCjdB4inDC7 M6Sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZNhj6eZ+woxfBEey08C73nVttViQ4M55kma9OpXArS+hHDE4K EnaBlHvw00wRVCSn4PivTaxb+/QcjiiFhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys5pL695Uuh57hZFp3qna2Z8S1pa6xz3jsx1M+Y+8YUOVwsk8cf1FMa3h1Zr+vBB5Zv/c9eA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e2c4:: with SMTP id d4mr20586303wrj.568.1638022659177; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from claire-ThinkPad-T470 (dynamic-2a01-0c22-7349-1000-d163-c2fa-698a-934f.c22.pool.telefonica.de. [2a01:c22:7349:1000:d163:c2fa:698a:934f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l21sm8609593wrb.38.2021.11.27.06.17.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:17:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:17:37 +0100 From: Fan Fei To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: bjorn@helgaas.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Remove device * in struct Message-ID: <20211127141737.GA46129@claire-ThinkPad-T470> References: <20211123160531.GA2225123@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211123160531.GA2225123@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:05:31AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:38:34PM +0100, Fan Fei wrote: > > Remove "device *" in structs that refer struct dw_pcie or cdns_pcie. > > Because these two struct contain a "struct device *" already. > > > > Fan Fei (4): PCI: j721e: Remove cast of void* type PCI: tegra194: > > Remove device * in struct PCI: al: Remove device * in struct PCI: > > j721e: Remove device * in struct > > > > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c | 14 ++- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 10 +- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 109 +++++++++++---------- > > 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > Your "Prefer of_device_get_match_data()" series applies cleanly on my > "main" branch. > > But this series doesn't apply cleanly on "main" (v5.16-rc1) or on top of > the "Prefer of_device_get_match_data()" series. > > Can you rebase to apply on v5.16-rc1 or, if there are conflicts with the > previous series, on top of that previous series? > I sent the 1st patch sereis "rename-struct", and the 2nd patch series "unify-platform_device" to the mailing list. Also, does this response go the correct list? Thank you for helping me learn the rules to work with the kernel community. > Kind regards Fan