public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 3/4] PCI/portdrv: Check platform supported service IRQ's
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 10:36:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220112163646.GA263326@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220112103402.ldeqff3dlxi2azgn@pali>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:34:02AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2022 10:42:50 Stefan Roese wrote:
> > From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
> > 
> > Platforms may have dedicated IRQ lines for PCIe services like
> > AER/PME etc., check for such IRQ lines.
> > Check if platform has any dedicated IRQ lines for PCIe
> > services.

Use the terminology from the spec again ("platform-specific System
Errors").

> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > Tested-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > index bda630889f95..70dd45671ed8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> > @@ -358,6 +358,14 @@ int pcie_port_device_register(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Some platforms have dedicated interrupt line from root complex to
> > +	 * interrupt controller for PCIe services like AER/PME etc., check
> > +	 * if platform registered with any such IRQ.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > +		pci_check_platform_service_irqs(dev, irqs, capabilities);
> > +
> 
> In my opinion calling this hook at this stage is too late. Few lines
> above is following code:
> 
> 	if (irq_services) {
> 		/*
> 		 * Initialize service IRQs. Don't use service devices that
> 		 * require interrupts if there is no way to generate them.
> 		 * However, some drivers may have a polling mode (e.g.
> 		 * pciehp_poll_mode) that can be used in the absence of IRQs.
> 		 * Allow them to determine if that is to be used.
> 		 */
> 		status = pcie_init_service_irqs(dev, irqs, irq_services);
> 		if (status) {
> 			irq_services &= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
> 			if (!irq_services)
> 				goto error_disable;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> Function pcie_init_service_irqs() fails if "dev" does not have any
> suitable interrupt. Which happens for devices / root ports without
> support for standard interrupts (INTx / MSI).
> 
> I think that this new hook should have preference over
> pcie_init_service_irqs() and after this new hook should be
> pcie_init_service_irqs() called only for irq_services which new hook has
> not filled. And if at least new hook or pcie_init_service_irqs() passes
> then "error_disable" path should not be called.

I tend to agree.  I expect that a host bridge will only use this new
mechanism if the standard INTx/MSI interrupts don't work.  

I guess it's possible a device could use platform-specific errors for
some services and standard INTx/MSI for others, but unless we have an
example of that, I'm not sure it's worth trying to support that.

For now, I think it will be simpler to skip pcie_init_service_irqs()
completely if the platform-specific hook is successful.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-12 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-12  9:42 [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Add setup_platform_service_irq hook to struct pci_host_bridge Stefan Roese
2022-01-12  9:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: Add pci_check_platform_service_irqs Stefan Roese
2022-01-12 16:42   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-13  9:08     ` Stefan Roese
2022-01-12  9:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/4] PCI/portdrv: Check platform supported service IRQ's Stefan Roese
2022-01-12 10:34   ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-12 16:36     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-01-13  9:04       ` Stefan Roese
2022-01-12  9:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: xilinx-nwl: Add method to setup_platform_service_irq hook Stefan Roese
2022-01-12 10:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: Add setup_platform_service_irq hook to struct pci_host_bridge Pali Rohár
2022-01-13  8:42   ` Stefan Roese
2022-01-12 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-13  8:46   ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220112163646.GA263326@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox