From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Blazej Kucman <blazej.kucman@intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [Bug 215525] New: HotPlug does not work on upstream kernel 5.17.0-rc1
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:03:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220128140328.GA206121@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAd53p5HJT-UHd-Bm9KhWaEKAhUiWcYerLaM=ztksAe4XdLLCA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:49:34PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:08 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 09:29:31AM +0100, Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 20:52:12 -0600
> > > Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 03:46:15PM +0100, Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > Thanks for your suggestions. Blazej did some tests and results were
> > > > > inconclusive. He tested it on two same platforms. On the first one
> > > > > it didn't work, even if he reverted all suggested patches. On the
> > > > > second one hotplugs always worked.
> > > > >
> > > > > He noticed that on first platform where issue has been found
> > > > > initally, there was boot parameter "pci=nommconf". After adding
> > > > > this parameter on the second platform, hotplugs stopped working too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested on tag pci-v5.17-changes. He have CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE
> > > > > and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG enabled in config. He also attached two
> > > > > dmesg logs to bugzilla with boot parameter 'dyndbg="file pciehp*
> > > > > +p" as requested. One with "pci=nommconf" and one without.
> > > > >
> > > > > Issue seems to related to "pci=nommconf" and it is probably caused
> > > > > by change outside pciehp.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe I'm missing something. If I understand correctly, the problem
> > > > has nothing to do with the kernel version (correct me if I'm wrong!)
> > >
> > > The problem occurred after the merge commit. It is some kind of
> > > regression.
> >
> > The bug report doesn't yet contain the evidence showing this. It only
> > contains dmesg logs with "pci=nommconf" where pciehp doesn't work
> > (which is the expected behavior) and a log without "pci=nommconf"
> > where pciehp does work (which is again the expected behavior).
> >
> > > > PCIe native hotplug doesn't work when booted with "pci=nommconf".
> > > > When using "pci=nommconf", obviously we can't access the extended PCI
> > > > config space (offset 0x100-0xfff), so none of the extended
> > > > capabilities are available.
> > > >
> > > > In that case, we don't even ask the platform for control of PCIe
> > > > hotplug via _OSC. From the dmesg diff from normal (working) to
> > > > "pci=nommconf" (not working):
> > > >
> > > > -Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-smp ...
> > > > +Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-smp pci=nommconf ...
> > > > ...
> > > > -acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM
> > > > Segments MSI HPX-Type3] -acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: platform does not
> > > > support [AER LTR] -acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS now controls
> > > > [PCIeHotplug PME PCIeCapability] +acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports
> > > > [ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI HPX-Type3] +acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: not
> > > > requesting OS control; OS requires [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM MSI]
> > > > +acpi PNP0A08:00: MMCONFIG is disabled, can't access extended PCI
> > > > configuration space under this bridge.
> > >
> > > So, it shouldn't work from years but it has been broken recently, that
> > > is the only objection I have. Could you tell why it was working?
> > > According to your words- it shouldn't. We are using VMD driver, is that
> > > matter?
> >
> > 04b12ef163d1 ("PCI: vmd: Honor ACPI _OSC on PCIe features") looks like
> > a it could be related. Try reverting that commit and see whether it
> > makes a difference.
>
> The affected NVMe is indeed behind VMD domain, so I think the commit
> can make a difference.
>
> Does VMD behave differently on laptops and servers?
> Anyway, I agree that the issue really lies in "pci=nommconf".
Oh, I have a guess:
- With "pci=nommconf", prior to v5.17-rc1, pciehp did not work in
general, but *did* work for NVMe behind a VMD. As of v5.17-rc1,
pciehp no longer works for NVMe behind VMD.
- Without "pci=nommconf", pciehp works as expected for all devices
including NVMe behind VMD, both before and after v5.17-rc1.
Is that what you're observing?
If so, I doubt there's anything to fix other than getting rid of
"pci=nommconf".
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-215525-41252@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2022-01-24 21:46 ` [Bug 215525] New: HotPlug does not work on upstream kernel 5.17.0-rc1 Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-25 8:58 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-25 15:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-01-26 7:31 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-01-27 14:46 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-27 20:47 ` Jonathan Derrick
2022-01-27 22:31 ` Jonathan Derrick
2022-01-28 2:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-28 8:29 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2022-01-28 13:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-28 13:49 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-01-28 14:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-02-02 15:48 ` Blazej Kucman
2022-02-02 16:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-03 9:13 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-02-03 10:47 ` Blazej Kucman
2022-02-03 15:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-09 13:41 ` Blazej Kucman
2022-02-09 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-10 11:14 ` Blazej Kucman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220128140328.GA206121@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=blazej.kucman@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=naveennaidu479@gmail.com \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).