linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Zhi Li <lznuaa@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, hongxing.zhu@nxp.com,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dmaengine: dw-edma: add flags at struct dw_edma_chip
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:29:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220307135940.GN12451@workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHrpEqSFj8eTc9adhh21Ju_=P8Rb0xXVTa5QMcY-w-8xn+m5xg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:16:11AM -0600, Zhi Li wrote:
>  i
> 
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 10:19 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:46:33PM -0600, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Allow user don't enable remote MSI irq.
> > > PCI ep probe dma locally, don't want to raise irq
> > > to remote PCI host.
> > >
> > > Add option allow force 32bit register access even at
> > > 64bit system. i.MX8 hardware only allowed 32bit register
> > > access.
> > >
> > > Add option allow EP side probe dma. remote side dma is
> > > continue physical memory, local memory is scatter list.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > Change from v1 to v2
> > > - none
> > >
> > >  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c    |  7 ++++++-
> > >  drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> > >  include/linux/dma/edma.h              |  7 +++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > index 0cb66434f9e14..a43bb26c8bf96 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> > > @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> > >       struct dw_edma_desc *desc;
> > >       u32 cnt = 0;
> > >       int i;
> > > +     bool b;
> > >
> > >       if (!chan->configured)
> > >               return NULL;
> > > @@ -424,7 +425,11 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> > >               chunk->ll_region.sz += burst->sz;
> > >               desc->alloc_sz += burst->sz;
> > >
> > > -             if (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) {
> > > +             b = (chan->dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE);
> > > +             if (chan->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL_EP)
> > > +                     b = !b;
> > > +
> > > +             if (b) {
> >
> > I've added a patch that uses the xfer direction and channel direction to
> > find out whether it is a read operation or not. Please take a look:
> >
> > https://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/qualcomm/kernel.git/commit/?h=tracking-qcomlt-sdx55-drivers&id=d6a3f432204614ad8531321949a8a9e2c3e94c3b
> >
> 
> I think your patch is better.  Can I include your patch into this sequence ?
> 

Yes, feel free to. Also, there is one more cleanup patch I've added:
https://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/qualcomm/kernel.git/commit/?h=tracking-qcomlt-sdx55-drivers&id=85eb58bd078000dd938487f560cee5d259f06577

> > The patch could also make use of the "DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL" flag if you
> > prefer.
> >
> > >                       burst->sar = src_addr;
> > >                       if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_CYCLIC) {
> > >                               burst->dar = xfer->xfer.cyclic.paddr;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> > > index 6e2f83e31a03a..d5c2415e2c616 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> > > @@ -307,13 +307,18 @@ u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(struct dw_edma_chip *chip, enum dw_edma_dir
> > >  static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
> > >  {
> > >       struct dw_edma_burst *child;
> > > +     struct dw_edma_chan *chan = chunk->chan;
> > >       struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli;
> > >       struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp;
> > >       u32 control = 0, i = 0;
> > > +     u32 rie = 0;
> > >       int j;
> > >
> > >       lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr;
> > >
> > > +     if (!(chan->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_NO_MSI))
> > > +             rie = DW_EDMA_V0_RIE;
> > > +
> > >       if (chunk->cb)
> > >               control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB;
> > >
> > > @@ -321,7 +326,7 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk)
> > >       list_for_each_entry(child, &chunk->burst->list, list) {
> > >               j--;
> > >               if (!j)
> > > -                     control |= (DW_EDMA_V0_LIE | DW_EDMA_V0_RIE);
> > > +                     control |= (DW_EDMA_V0_LIE | rie);
> >
> > I think the MSI makes sense only for eDMA access from remote. So how
> > about reusing the same flag you used above?
> 
> Understand,  DW_EDMA_CHIP_NO_MSI is more direct.  User can know what
> exactly control.
> 

Right but isn't using "DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL" implies NO_MSI? Or is there
any endpoint implementation that makes use of MSIs also?

> DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL is quite general.  User don't know what to do from naming.
> 
> I am okay for both naming.
> 
> If I pick up your patch for dma dir,  Only below two flags need,
>           #define DW_EDMA_CHIP_NO_MSI            BIT(0)
>           #define DW_EDMA_CHIP_REG32BIT        BIT(1)
> 
> vs
>           #define DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL              BIT(0)
>           #define DW_EDMA_CHIP_REG32BIT        BIT(1)

How about "DW_EDMA_CHIP_32BIT_DBI"?

Also add comments for both flags.

> 
> which one is better?
> 
> >
> >         control |= DW_EDMA_V0_LIE;
> >
> >         /* Raise MSI only if the eDMA is accessed by remote */
> >         if (!(chan->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL))
> >                 control |= DW_EDMA_V0_RIE;
> >
> > >
> > >               /* Channel control */
> > >               SET_LL_32(&lli[i].control, control);
> > > @@ -420,15 +425,16 @@ void dw_edma_v0_core_start(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk, bool first)
> > >               SET_CH_32(chip, chan->dir, chan->id, ch_control1,
> > >                         (DW_EDMA_V0_CCS | DW_EDMA_V0_LLE));
> > >               /* Linked list */
> > > -             #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > +             if (!(chan->chip->flags & DW_EDMA_CHIP_REG32BIT) &&
> > > +                     IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > >                       SET_CH_64(chip, chan->dir, chan->id, llp.reg,
> > >                                 chunk->ll_region.paddr);
> >
> > Why you are doing 32bit access here only and not in other places?
> >
> 
> Only here access DBI register, other place is access dma link list,
> which is memory.
> 

Okay. Then you need to specify it clearly in commit message as well.

Thanks,
Mani

> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > > -             #else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> > > +             } else {
> > >                       SET_CH_32(chip, chan->dir, chan->id, llp.lsb,
> > >                                 lower_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> > >                       SET_CH_32(chip, chan->dir, chan->id, llp.msb,
> > >                                 upper_32_bits(chunk->ll_region.paddr));
> > > -             #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> > > +             }
> > >       }
> > >       /* Doorbell */
> > >       SET_RW_32(chip, chan->dir, doorbell,
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > index fcfbc0f47f83d..e74ee15d9832a 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h
> > > @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ enum dw_edma_map_format {
> > >       EDMA_MF_HDMA_COMPAT = 0x5
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +#define DW_EDMA_CHIP_NO_MSI  BIT(0)
> > > +#define DW_EDMA_CHIP_REG32BIT        BIT(1)
> > > +#define DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL_EP        BIT(2)
> >
> > As per my understanding the
> 
> what's you mean?
> 
> >
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * struct dw_edma_chip - representation of DesignWare eDMA controller hardware
> > >   * @dev:              struct device of the eDMA controller
> > > @@ -40,6 +44,8 @@ enum dw_edma_map_format {
> > >   * @nr_irqs:          total dma irq number
> > >   * reg64bit           if support 64bit write to register
> > >   * @ops                       DMA channel to IRQ number mapping
> > > + * @flags             - DW_EDMA_CHIP_NO_MSI can't generate remote MSI irq
> > > + *                    - DW_EDMA_CHIP_REG32BIT only support 32bit register write
> > >   * @wr_ch_cnt                 DMA write channel number
> > >   * @rd_ch_cnt                 DMA read channel number
> > >   * @rg_region                 DMA register region
> > > @@ -53,6 +59,7 @@ struct dw_edma_chip {
> > >       int                     id;
> > >       int                     nr_irqs;
> > >       const struct dw_edma_core_ops   *ops;
> > > +     u32                     flags;
> > >
> > >       void __iomem            *reg_base;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0.rc1
> > >

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03 18:46 [PATCH v2 1/5] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix dw_edma_probe() can't be call globally Frank Li
2022-03-03 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] dmaengine: dw-edma-pcie: don't touch internal struct dw_edma Frank Li
2022-03-03 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dmaengine: dw-edma: add flags at struct dw_edma_chip Frank Li
2022-03-04 16:19   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-04 17:16     ` Zhi Li
2022-03-07 13:59       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2022-03-04 21:31   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-03-03 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: add PCIe embedded DMA support Frank Li
2022-03-04 21:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-03-05  1:31     ` Zhi Li
2022-03-09 12:01   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-09 18:31     ` Zhi Li
2022-03-09 18:42       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-09 19:14         ` Zhi Li
2022-03-09 20:48           ` Zhi Li
2022-03-10  4:45           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-03 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: endpoint: functions/pci-epf-test: Support PCI controller DMA Frank Li
2022-03-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dmaengine: dw-edma: fix dw_edma_probe() can't be call globally Zhi Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220307135940.GN12451@workstation \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lznuaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).