From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mehta, Sanju" <Sanju.Mehta@amd.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] PCI / ACPI: Assume "HotPlugSupportInD3" only if device can wake from D3
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 07:29:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401122918.GA87920@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jqWZRp2ZcyO+w66EgE8SHFZ+ZeNka2aUMfLwU93wuxpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:40 AM Mario Limonciello
> <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > acpi_pci_bridge_d3(dev) returns "true" if "dev" is a hotplug bridge
> > that can handle hotplug events while in D3. Previously this meant:
> >
> > 1) "dev" has a _PS0 or _PR0 method, or
> >
> > 2) The Root Port above "dev" has a _DSD with a "HotPlugSupportInD3"
> > property with value 1.
> >
> > This did not consider_S0W, which tells us the deepest D-state from
> > which a device can wake itself (ACPI v6.4, sec 7.3.20).
> >
> > On some platforms, e.g., AMD Yellow Carp, firmware may supply
> > "HotPlugSupportInD3" even though the platform does not supply power
> > resources through _PRW and _S0W tells us the device cannot wake from
>
> More importantly, it doesn't supply a wakeup GPE number through _PRW,
> so from the ACPI perspective the bridge has no way of generating
> wakeup signals.
Perfect, thanks. That's the missing piece about _PRW.
> > D3hot. With the previous code, these devices could be put in D3hot
> > and hotplugged devices would not be recognized without manually
> > rescanning.
> >
> > If _S0W exists and says the Root Port cannot wake itself from D3hot,
> > return "false" to indicate that "dev" cannot handle hotplug events
> > while in D3.
> >
> > 1) "dev" has a _PS0 or _PR0 method, or
> >
> > 2a) The Root Port above "dev" has _PRW and
> >
> > 2b) If the Root Port above "dev" has _S0W, it can wake from D3hot or
> > D3cold and
> >
> > 2c) The Root Port above "dev" has a _DSD with a
> > "HotPlugSupportInD3" property with value 1.
> >
> > Windows 10 and Windows 11 both will prevent the bridge from going in D3
> > when the firmware is configured this way and this change aligns the
> > handling of the situation to be the same.
> >
> > Link: https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/device-power-management-objects.html?highlight=s0w#s0w-s0-device-wake-state
> > Link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/pci/dsd-for-pcie-root-ports#identifying-pcie-root-ports-supporting-hot-plug-in-d3
> > Fixes: 26ad34d510a87 ("PCI / ACPI: Whitelist D3 for more PCIe hotplug ports")
> > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> > --
> > v5->v6:
> > * Re-order checks to only check for _DSD if necessary as suggested by Bjorn.
> > * Adjust commit message wording
> > * Drop rewording comment patch, just apply it while moving text to avoid
> > ping-ponging the same lines in the commits.
> > v4-v5:
> > * Don't fail if _S0W is missing
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > index 1f15ab7eabf8..5ab797e2709d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> > @@ -976,7 +976,9 @@ bool acpi_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > const union acpi_object *obj;
> > struct acpi_device *adev;
> > + unsigned long long state;
> > struct pci_dev *rpdev;
> > + acpi_status status;
> >
> > if (acpi_pci_disabled || !dev->is_hotplug_bridge)
> > return false;
> > @@ -985,12 +987,6 @@ bool acpi_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > if (acpi_pci_power_manageable(dev))
> > return true;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * The ACPI firmware will provide the device-specific properties through
> > - * _DSD configuration object. Look for the 'HotPlugSupportInD3' property
> > - * for the root port and if it is set we know the hierarchy behind it
> > - * supports D3 just fine.
> > - */
> > rpdev = pcie_find_root_port(dev);
> > if (!rpdev)
> > return false;
> > @@ -999,6 +995,23 @@ bool acpi_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > if (!adev)
> > return false;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * If the bridge can't wake from D3hot, it can't signal hotplug
> > + * events in D3hot.
>
> I would say "If the bridge cannot signal wakeup signals at all, it
> cannot signal hotplug events from low-power states including D3hot and
> D3cold."
>
> With the two above remarks addressed, please feel free to add
>
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Great, thanks!
> > + */
> > + if (!adev->wakeup.flags.valid)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_S0W", NULL, &state);
> > + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && state < ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The ACPI firmware will provide the device-specific properties through
> > + * _DSD configuration object. Look for the 'HotPlugSupportInD3' property
> > + * for the root port and if it is set we make an assumption that the
> > + * hierarchy behind it supports D3 as well.
> > + */
> > if (acpi_dev_get_property(adev, "HotPlugSupportInD3",
> > ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER, &obj) < 0)
> > return false;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 3:40 [PATCH v6] PCI / ACPI: Assume "HotPlugSupportInD3" only if device can wake from D3 Mario Limonciello
2022-04-01 11:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-01 12:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-04-01 12:32 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-04-01 12:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-01 15:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401122918.GA87920@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Sanju.Mehta@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).