linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Myron Stowe" <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	"Juha-Pekka Heikkila" <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
	"Benoit Grégoire" <benoitg@coeus.ca>,
	"Hui Wang" <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
	"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/PCI: Log E820 clipping
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:03:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419150344.GA1198281@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d75ede81-49da-855a-6679-c3315089e067@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:59:17AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 1/1/70 01:00, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > This is still work-in-progress on the issue of PNP0A03 _CRS methods that
> > are buggy or not interpreted correctly by Linux.
> > 
> > The previous try at:
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304035110.988712-1-helgaas@kernel.org
> > caused regressions on some Chromebooks:
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yjyv03JsetIsTJxN@sirena.org.uk
> > 
> > This v2 drops the commit that caused the Chromebook regression, so it also
> > doesn't fix the issue we were *trying* to fix on Lenovo Yoga and Clevo
> > Barebones.
> > 
> > The point of this v2 update is to split the logging patch into (1) a pure
> > logging addition and (2) the change to only clip PCI windows, which was
> > previously hidden inside the logging patch and not well documented.
> > 
> > Bjorn Helgaas (3):
> >   x86/PCI: Eliminate remove_e820_regions() common subexpressions
> >   x86: Log resource clipping for E820 regions
> >   x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows for E820 regions
> 
> Thanks, the entire series looks good to me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Thank you!

> So what is the plan to actually fix the issue seen on some Lenovo models
> and Clevo Barebones ?   As I mentioned previously I think that since all
> our efforts have failed so far that we should maybe reconsider just
> using DMI quirks to ignore the E820 reservation windows for host bridges
> on affected models ?

I have been resisting DMI quirks but I'm afraid there's no other way.
I think the web we've gotten into, where vendors have used E820 to
interact with _CRS in incompatible and undocumented ways, is not
sustainable.

I'm not aware of any spec that says the OS should use E820 to clip
things out of _CRS, so I think the long term plan should be to
decouple them by default.

Straw man:

  - Disable E820 clipping by default.

  - Add a quirk to enable E820 clipping for machines older than X,
    e.g., 2023, to avoid breaking machines that currently work.

  - Add quirks to disable E820 clipping for individual machines like
    the Lenovo and Clevos that predate X, but E820 clipping breaks
    them.

  - Add quirks to enable E820 clipping for individual machines like
    the Chromebooks (and probably machines we don't know about yet)
    that have devices that consume part of _CRS but are not
    enumerable.

  - Communicate this to OEMs to try to prevent future machines that
    need quirks.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-19 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14 18:22 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/PCI: Log E820 clipping Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-14 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/PCI: Eliminate remove_e820_regions() common subexpressions Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-14 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: Log resource clipping for E820 regions Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-15 14:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-14 18:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/PCI: Clip only host bridge windows " Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-19  9:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/PCI: Log E820 clipping Hans de Goede
2022-04-19 15:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-04-19 15:16     ` Hans de Goede
2022-04-19 16:45       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-02 12:24         ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-02 20:32           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-05 15:03             ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220419150344.GA1198281@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=benoitg@coeus.ca \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
    --cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).