From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, koba.ko@canonical.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI/PM: Fix pci_pm_suspend_noirq() to disable PTM
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:24:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422222446.GA1522716@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba571993-90fb-ae67-6617-0b63571298be@intel.com>
[+cc other folks interested in PTM from https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220408153159.106741-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com]
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 07:54:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On 3/25/2022 8:50 PM, Rajvi Jingar wrote:
> > For the PCIe devices (like nvme) that do not go into D3 state still need to
> > disable PTM on PCIe root ports to allow the port to enter a lower-power PM
> > state and the SoC to reach a lower-power idle state as a whole. Move the
> > pci_disable_ptm() out of pci_prepare_to_sleep() as this code path is not
> > followed for devices that do not go into D3. This patch fixes the issue
> > seen on Dell XPS 9300 with Ice Lake CPU and Dell Precision 5530 with Coffee
> > Lake CPU platforms to get improved residency in low power idle states.
> >
> > Fixes: a697f072f5da ("PCI: Disable PTM during suspend to save power")
> > Signed-off-by: Rajvi Jingar <rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2: add Fixes tag in commit message
> > v2 -> v3: move changelog after "---" marker
> > v3 -> v4: add "---" marker after changelog
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 10 ----------
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > index 8b55a90126a2..ab733374a260 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -847,6 +847,16 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
> > pci_save_state(pci_dev);
> > + /*
> > + * There are systems (for example, Intel mobile chips since Coffee
> > + * Lake) where the power drawn while suspended can be significantly
> > + * reduced by disabling PTM on PCIe root ports as this allows the
> > + * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
> > + * lower-power idle state as a whole.
> > + */
> > + if (pci_pcie_type(pci_dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > + pci_disable_ptm(pci_dev);
Why is disabling PTM dependent on pci_dev->state_saved? The point of
this is to change the behavior of the device, and it seems like we
want to do that regardless of whether the driver has used
pci_save_state().
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220325195053.769373-1-rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
2022-04-14 17:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI/PM: refactor pci_pm_suspend_noirq() Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-20 16:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <20220325195053.769373-2-rajvi.jingar@intel.com>
2022-04-14 17:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI/PM: Fix pci_pm_suspend_noirq() to disable PTM Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-22 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-04-23 0:43 ` Jingar, Rajvi
2022-04-23 15:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-25 18:32 ` David E. Box
2022-04-25 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-26 16:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-27 4:22 ` David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220422222446.GA1522716@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=koba.ko@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajvi.jingar@intel.com \
--cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).