linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan  <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>,
	Oliver OHalloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Handle Multi UnCorrectable/Correctable errors properly
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 18:40:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511234024.GA831116@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418150237.1021519-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 03:02:37PM +0000, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Currently the aer_irq() handler returns IRQ_NONE for cases without bits
> PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV or PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV are set. But this
> assumption is incorrect.
> 
> Consider a scenario where aer_irq() is triggered for a correctable
> error, and while we process the error and before we clear the error
> status in "Root Error Status" register, if the same kind of error
> is triggered again, since aer_irq() only clears events it saw, the
> multi-bit error is left in tact. This will cause the interrupt to fire
> again, resulting in entering aer_irq() with just the multi-bit error
> logged in the "Root Error Status" register.
> 
> Repeated AER recovery test has revealed this condition does happen
> and this prevents any new interrupt from being triggered. Allow to
> process interrupt even if only multi-correctable (BIT 1) or
> multi-uncorrectable bit (BIT 3) is set.
> 
> Also note that, for cases with only multi-bit error is set, since this
> is not the first occurrence of the error, PCI_ERR_ROOT_ERR_SRC may have
> zero or some junk value. So we cannot cleanly process this error
> information using aer_isr_one_error(). All we are attempting with this
> fix is to make sure error interrupt processing can continue in this
> scenario.
> 
> This error can be reproduced by making following changes to the
> aer_irq() function and by executing the given test commands.
> 
>  static irqreturn_t aer_irq(int irq, void *context)
>          struct aer_err_source e_src = {};
> 
>          pci_read_config_dword(rp, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS,
> 				&e_src.status);
>  +       pci_dbg(pdev->port, "Root Error Status: %04x\n",
>  +		e_src.status);
>          if (!(e_src.status & AER_ERR_STATUS_MASK))

Do you mean

  if (!(e_src.status & (PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV|PCI_ERR_ROOT_COR_RCV)))

here?  AER_ERR_STATUS_MASK would be after this fix.

>                  return IRQ_NONE;
> 
>  +       mdelay(5000);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-18 15:02 [PATCH v3] PCI/AER: Handle Multi UnCorrectable/Correctable errors properly Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-05-11 15:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-11 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-11 23:39   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-11 23:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-05-12  0:29   ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-05-17 22:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511234024.GA831116@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).