From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc()
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:51:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826155119.GA2933552@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d818f9c9-a432-213e-4152-eaff3b7da52e@oderland.se>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:07:47AM +0100, Josef Johansson wrote:
> From: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
>
> PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc()
>
> Commit 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") modifies
> the logic of checking msi_attrib.can_mask, without any reason.
>
> This commits restores that logic.
>
> Fixes: 71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()")
> Signed-off-by: Josef Johansson <josef@oderland.se>
Applied to pci/misc for v6.1 with commit log below, thanks!
PCI/MSI: Correct 'can_mask' test in msi_add_msi_desc()
71020a3c0dff4 ("PCI/MSI: Use msi_add_msi_desc()") inadvertently reversed
the sense of "msi_attrib.can_mask" in one use:
- if (entry->pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) {
- addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(entry);
- entry->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
+ if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) {
+ addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc);
+ desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
Restore the original test.
> ---
> v2: Changing subject line to fit earlier commits.
>
> Trying to fix a NULL BUG in the NVMe MSIX implementation I stumbled upon this code,
> which ironically was what my last MSI patch resulted into.
>
> I don't see any reason why this logic was change, and it did not break anything
> correcting the logic.
>
> CC xen-devel since it very much relates to Xen kernel (via pci_msi_ignore_mask).
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> index c19c7ca58186..146e7b9a01cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/msi.c
> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int msix_setup_msi_descs(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base,
> desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask = !pci_msi_ignore_mask &&
> !desc.pci.msi_attrib.is_virtual;
>
> - if (!desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) {
> + if (desc.pci.msi_attrib.can_mask) {
> addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(&desc);
> desc.pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 10:07 [PATCH v2] PCI/MSI: Correct use of can_mask in msi_add_msi_desc() Josef Johansson
2022-08-05 10:03 ` Josef Johansson
2022-08-05 12:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-05 15:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-08-26 13:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-26 15:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826155119.GA2933552@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=josef@oderland.se \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox