From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Richard Rogalski <rrogalski@tutanota.com>
Cc: Linux Pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SPARC64: getting "no compatible bridge window" errors :/
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:35:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221003223500.GA2124698@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220926171104.GA1605932@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 12:11:06PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Alex, David, sparclinux, LKML]
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 06:59:23PM +0200, Richard Rogalski wrote:
> > I hope this is the right place for this.
>
> This is great, thanks a lot for your report! Is this a regression?
> If so, what's the most recent kernel that worked?
>
> > In my dmesg output, I get things like:
> >
> > pci 0000:04:00.0: can't claim VGA legacy [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff]: no compatible bridge window
> > pci 0000:06:00.0: can't claim VGA legacy [mem 0x000a0000-0x000bffff]: no compatible bridge window
> > pci 0000:06:00.1: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x84110200000-0x84110203fff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
> >
> > I opened a bug for amdgpu [here](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2169) but looking further into it I think it is caused by deeper PCIe problems :\
> >
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/cbf47807972c8a990bb2a8cdbb39ad9e/8C7CA9QNG dmesg log
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/6a799425dea50febd82f8bc11e54433a/ll.txt lspci -vv
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/7d4a794b1f7d67a1ffcdee5dfdec3ad6/config.txt kernel .config
>
> Your error output attachment [1] contains an address that looks like
> it's in 06:00.0 BAR 5:
>
> pci 0000:06:00.0: reg 0x24: [mem 0x84001200000-0x8400123ffff]
> NON-RESUMABLE ERROR: insn effective address [0x0000084001201410]
>
> This looks like an amdgpu issue. There have been recent changes like
> c1c39032a074 ("drm/amdgpu: make sure to init common IP before gmc")
> and dd6aeb4e5f59 ("drm/amdgpu: Don't enable LTR if not supported")
> that could be related.
>
> The PCI "no compatible bridge window" warnings are definitely an
> issue, but I don't think they're related to the amdgpu crash:
>
> pci@400: PCI MEM64 [mem 0x84100000000-0x84dffffffff] offset 80000000000
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x84100000000-0x84dffffffff] (bus address [0x4100000000-0x4dffffffff])
> pci 0000:09:00.0: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x84120000000-0x8412007ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
>
> Those and this from lspci:
>
> 0000:01:00.0 bridge to [bus 02-09] window [mem 0x4100000000-0x412fffffff pref]
> 0000:02:0c.0 bridge to [bus 09] window [mem 0x4120000000-0x412fffffff pref]
> 0000:09:00.0 Intel 82599ES NIC Region 0: Memory at 0x84120000000
>
> are telling us there's something wrong with how the resource-to-bus
> offset is being applied. It looks like the offset was applied to the
> NIC BAR, but didn't get applied to the bridge windows.
>
> Could you start a new thread here (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, and sparclinux@vger.kernel.org) for this
> issue and attach the dmesg log when booting with "ofpci_debug=1"?
Any chance you could collect a dmesg log with "ofpci_debug=1"?
I'd like to look at the resource-to-bus offset issue.
> Do the devices we complain about (NICs and storage HBAs 09:00.0,
> 09:00.1, 0d:00.0, 0d:00.1, 0e:00.0, 0f:00.0, 0001:03:00.0,
> 0001:03:00.1, 0001:0:00.0, 0001:0a:00.1) work?
>
> Bjorn
>
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/uploads/b51f4d6783eeebf90de9a400525d07d6/qq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-03 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-25 16:59 SPARC64: getting "no compatible bridge window" errors :/ Richard Rogalski
2022-09-26 17:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-10-03 22:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-10-10 21:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-21 3:47 Richard Rogalski
2022-10-24 18:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221003223500.GA2124698@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrogalski@tutanota.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).