Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>,
	David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] pci: Work around ASMedia ASM2824 PCIe link training failures
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 00:07:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101230709.fqlj3fxguprltyga@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221009141434.ddijf6w76cz5ch2v@pali>

Bjorn, Krzysztof: Gentle reminder.

On Sunday 09 October 2022 16:14:34 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Bjorn, Krzysztof: could you please look at this patch series and say
> what do you think about it? It is quite strange issue for which is
> defined PCI_ANY_ID quirk... And is needs to be somehow workarounded.
> 
> On Saturday 17 September 2022 13:03:05 Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >  This is v5 of the change to work around a PCIe link training phenomenon 
> > where a pair of devices both capable of operating at a link speed above 
> > 2.5GT/s seems unable to negotiate the link speed and continues training 
> > indefinitely with the Link Training bit switching on and off repeatedly 
> > and the data link layer never reaching the active state.
> > 
> >  This was originally observed in a configuration featuring a downstream 
> > port of the ASMedia ASM2824 Gen 3 switch wired to the upstream port of the 
> > Pericom PI7C9X2G304 Gen 2 switch.  However in the course of review I have 
> > come to the conclusion that similarly to the earlier similar change to 
> > U-Boot it is indeed expected to be safe to apply this workaround to any 
> > downstream port that has failed link negotiation provided that:
> > 
> > 1. the port is capable of reporting the data link layer link active 
> >    status (because unlike U-Boot we cannot busy-loop continuously polling 
> >    the link training bit),
> > 
> > and:
> > 
> > 2. we don't attempt to lift the 2.5GT/s speed restriction, imposed as the
> >    basis of the workaround, for devices not explicitly known to continue 
> >    working in that case.
> > 
> > It is expected to be safe because the workaround is applied to a failed 
> > link, that is one that does not (at the time this code is executed) work 
> > anyway, so trying to bring it up cannot make the situation worse.  So this 
> > version of the workaround is attempted for all PCIe devices discovered, 
> > and only the lifting of the 2.5GT/s speed restriction is qualified by the 
> > vendor:device ID, currently one of the ASMedia ASM2824 device only.
> > 
> >  Broadening the scope of the quirk has in turn made it necessary to make 
> > some adjustments to code elsewhere and consequently what was originally a 
> > single patch has now become a small series instead.
> > 
> >  This has been verified with a SiFive HiFive unmatched board, booting with 
> > or without the workaround activated in U-Boot, which covered both the link 
> > retraining part of the quirk and the lifting of speed restriction already 
> > imposed by U-Boot.
> > 
> >  Please see individual change descriptions for further details.
> > 
> >  Questions or comments?  Otherwise please apply.
> > 
> >   Maciej

      reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-17 12:03 [PATCH v5 0/5] pci: Work around ASMedia ASM2824 PCIe link training failures Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-09-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] PCI: Consistently report presence of PCIe link registers Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-11-07 21:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-09-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: Export `pcie_cap_has_lnkctl2' Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-09-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] PCI: Export PCI link retrain timeout Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-09-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] PCI: Execute `quirk_enable_clear_retrain_link' earlier Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-09-17 12:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: Work around PCIe link training failures Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-11-03 23:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-03 23:41     ` Pali Rohár
2022-11-04  0:01       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-09  2:57         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-11-09  5:04           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-09 20:16             ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-29  9:57               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-11-29  9:57             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2022-10-09 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] pci: Work around ASMedia ASM2824 " Pali Rohár
2022-11-01 23:07   ` Pali Rohár [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221101230709.fqlj3fxguprltyga@pali \
    --to=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=wilson@tuliptree.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox